ChatterBank3 mins ago
The Pie Man
Darn i missed my chance to put a bet on
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /sport/ footbal l/fa-le ague-cu ps/sutt on-unit ed-goal keeper- wayne-s haw-res igns-pi e-publi city-st unt-qui ts-a759 1861.ht ml
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bazile. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Wayne has been offered a new job already !.
http:// www.msn .com/en -gb/spo rt/foot ball/mo rrisons -approa ch-sutt on-unit ed-goal keeper- wayne-s haw-to- become- officia l-pie-t aster/a r-AAnab qt?li=B BoPWjP
http://
No sympathy for this fool whatsoever. Sutton Utd's impressive cup run tarnished by the idiotic antics from the sidelines.
Betting in sport has uncovered some disgraceful rule-breaking.
Joey Barton himself, Stephen Lee in Snooker, Hanse Cronje in cricket. There are numerous examples.
If it isn't bad enough that some competitors seek to gain advantage from drug taking, there are plenty more unscrupulous folk who seek to gain financially.
They are the cancer of sport and deserve the severest of penalties.
Betting in sport has uncovered some disgraceful rule-breaking.
Joey Barton himself, Stephen Lee in Snooker, Hanse Cronje in cricket. There are numerous examples.
If it isn't bad enough that some competitors seek to gain advantage from drug taking, there are plenty more unscrupulous folk who seek to gain financially.
They are the cancer of sport and deserve the severest of penalties.
But surely if he hadn't eaten a pie then he could also have been accused of determining the outcome?
There is also the fact that the bet appears to be he must eat it 'on air' As he has no control of the cameraman either he was in league with the him or did not have full control of the outcome therefore could not fully influence the bet either way. Perhaps the cameraman should be investigated?
Seems to me either the Government outlaw such betting or accept there will always be a chance of someone being a bit less than honest.
There is also the fact that the bet appears to be he must eat it 'on air' As he has no control of the cameraman either he was in league with the him or did not have full control of the outcome therefore could not fully influence the bet either way. Perhaps the cameraman should be investigated?
Seems to me either the Government outlaw such betting or accept there will always be a chance of someone being a bit less than honest.
Steg, I thought you were referring to customers!
The bookies will give odds for a lot of the more, shall we say, bizarre requests.
The problem occurs when a sportsman or woman breaks the rules in relation to spkrts betting. The rules around this are very clear.
In this case, the goalkeeper has transgressed and paid the ultimate price.
One 'Desperate Dan' to have even considered it.
The bookies will give odds for a lot of the more, shall we say, bizarre requests.
The problem occurs when a sportsman or woman breaks the rules in relation to spkrts betting. The rules around this are very clear.
In this case, the goalkeeper has transgressed and paid the ultimate price.
One 'Desperate Dan' to have even considered it.