Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
How "sporting" Is Sport These Days ?
Is sport really "sporting" any more, at the highest levels. The latest farce being the last 10 minutes of the Japan v Poland World Cup match.
But there are other examples of course (e.g. F1 drivers pranging rivals, Cricketers sandpapering the ball)
It appears that once Big Money gets involved, corruption and cynicism arrives in a big way.
Not the best role models for today's youngsters I feel.
But there are other examples of course (e.g. F1 drivers pranging rivals, Cricketers sandpapering the ball)
It appears that once Big Money gets involved, corruption and cynicism arrives in a big way.
Not the best role models for today's youngsters I feel.
Answers
I keep mentioning the badminton at London 2012. I'm bringing it up again. Two teams were both trying to lose a match, as coming second would give them an easier path through the knockout stages. They were both DQ'd and rightly so. People have paid a lot of money to watch matches and they deserve to see a proper contest. Chuck the wasters out if they're not trying.
08:37 Sat 30th Jun 2018
The problem there was the daft rule about yellow cards etc being used to decide places.
Although it was unwholesome it was perfectly understandable.
In 1982 W Germany and Austria stitched up their gane with each other to ensure they both qualified. Again reprehensible, but on the other hand teams play to win to progress. If you need take no risks to do it then why bother?
Although it was unwholesome it was perfectly understandable.
In 1982 W Germany and Austria stitched up their gane with each other to ensure they both qualified. Again reprehensible, but on the other hand teams play to win to progress. If you need take no risks to do it then why bother?
I keep mentioning the badminton at London 2012. I'm bringing it up again. Two teams were both trying to lose a match, as coming second would give them an easier path through the knockout stages. They were both DQ'd and rightly so. People have paid a lot of money to watch matches and they deserve to see a proper contest. Chuck the wasters out if they're not trying.
I'm not sure about "these days".
I remmeber the Bodyline series from the 1930s; the dreadful fouling in the 1966 world cup; the drug cheating that was rife in the 1970s/80s especially by East Germans/Soviets but also Ben Johnson, 1904 Olympic games when the marathon winner was found to have travelled almsot half the route by car; 1981 Trevor Chappel bowled an underarm delivery when the batsman needed a 6 to win; Francis Lee's diving for penalties circa 1970; plus lots more
I remmeber the Bodyline series from the 1930s; the dreadful fouling in the 1966 world cup; the drug cheating that was rife in the 1970s/80s especially by East Germans/Soviets but also Ben Johnson, 1904 Olympic games when the marathon winner was found to have travelled almsot half the route by car; 1981 Trevor Chappel bowled an underarm delivery when the batsman needed a 6 to win; Francis Lee's diving for penalties circa 1970; plus lots more
The issue of manipulating results to ensure an easier progression is simply solved. The problem stems from having pre-determined draws. Competitions such as the World Cup should have no "Round Robin" formats but should be a simple knock-out. Once you lose you're out. This would have the added advantage of requiring only 16 matches to eliminate 16 teams instead of the ridiculous total of 48 needed under the current World Cup format. It would also reduce the ludicrous length of tedious TV coverage required. Added to that each round should be followed by a random draw (as with the FA Cup). Quite simple really if only a bit of thought was applied.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.