JJ109, but, as spicerack has demonstrated, the result can be seen without opening the link. You've apologised to him for misunderstanding that. Everyone can see the result at a glance.
JJ109, //I still maintain that if the only heading was "Rugby" then anyone who definitely did not want to see the result and knowing that it was in NEWS and is likely to be discussing the match - then don't open it until AFTER you have watched your recording! //
Going by that^, the message that the thread doesn't need to be opened to see the score was clearly eluding you - hence my post at 8.51.
I have a certain amount of sympathy with maggiebee, not a lot, but a certain amount.
It is annoying to see the result on the OP.
However, AB seems to be hurtling into total shambles as Section and Sub sections are becoming redundant and if you want your post to be recognised and dare I say this, debated, then one must choice a "functioning " section.
Naomi - my response at 8.59 responded to your 8.51 post
When you quote me please keep the context! I have already acknowledged that point - but have gone on to maintain - IF the only heading (ie if you cannot see the rest). The word IF is important - it does not matter that in this case you can see the score, my answer was based on "IF" you couldn't
My apologies for not grasping the niceties of AB. How on earth do you decide what section to put good news in? Have read many times "I put this in CB because nobody reads ?????"
Good news, pft.
I could stick 50+pts on Fiji on my tod. And the only way they'd score 17 is if I was sent off with ten minutes to go.
You see, this is why the ladies shouldn't comment on sport. (or politics)