Two wrongs certainly don't make a right but I am amazed at the gullibility of those who accepted all Diana's simpering statements without question. The vast majority of what is known of what went on within that marriage comes from her and her friends, none of whom will be unbiased. Re Harry, in profile he is remarkable like a young version of George V, especially with the beard.
yes zebo
she even took in the archibish of canterbury ( who must have met a few liars in this time ) by pointing to a headline and simpering look what I have to put up with ! ?
in fact when he realised her sleasy frenz had posted the pieces he named her as a " scheming liar"
I suppose the moral of the story is if you don't want to embarrass your family after your death do not send porny love letters to your bit on the side.
Retrochic - //I suppose the moral of the story is if you don't want to embarrass your family after your death do not send porny love letters to your bit on the side. //
You are wasted here - you should be a columnist with the Mail!!! LOL!
naomi - are you that naive? If they were gentille 'thank you' (not of the wham bam kind) and inviting him for afternoon tea Hewitt would hardly be wanting to sell them in America to the 'underground' collectors -he would flog them at Sotherby's
// Retrochic, 'porny'? You have no idea what the letters contain.//
exactly ...... a mot juste
they could for example be paeons on the landscape architecture of Lancelot Capability Broon, Diana loved gardening as much as she loved erm making love and she did both a lot ....
This would account for the hacks on Fleet Street refusing them on the grounds that they are too high brow
Di it is known also loved Verdi and rrestoration comedy and was often to be seen .....
naomi wrote " I don't think so. I doubt Sotherby's would touch them."
Really? they didn't think twice about flogging intimate luvvy lettres between Lucian Freud and his male 'friend' - Sotherby's even have a dedicated department for such things.
The long and close links between Southerbys and the Palace would probably negate the chances of the esteemed auctioneers getting into the gutter with Major Hewitt.
The point I was making was in answer to your observation that no one knows the contents of the letters. My opinion was that the content of the letters is probably more del monte than Domingo Del Monte, hence the need for the dashing Hewitt to offer them for sale to the American collectors - ie they would not be suitable or acceptable for sale in the UK.