ChatterBank0 min ago
Heres Part Of Whats Wrong In Britian..
44 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-34 41404/V oluntee r-PC-tr eated-c riminal -trying -protec t-colle ague-Sp ecial-c onstabl e-convi cted-da ngerous -drivin g-using -patrol -car-st op-thug -bikers .html
Letrs see the liberal do-gooders try and justify the decision...
The CPS and those that instigated the charges are s not fit for purpose if they think this was in the public interest...a complete bunch of *** and thats being kind
Letrs see the liberal do-gooders try and justify the decision...
The CPS and those that instigated the charges are s not fit for purpose if they think this was in the public interest...a complete bunch of *** and thats being kind
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bazwillrun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.In summary he wasn't trained to use a car in the use of a barrier to nutters on, off road, uninsured, untaxed scramble bikes. So he must be criminalised for using common sense. Good job it wasn't a toddler drowning in front of non water aware personnel, or child on a window ledge and no one with a height awareness badge in attendance. Forgive me if I don't trust one of them. Hell they can't afford to trust each other.
Just read the very end of the link.
It says '' For 7 years Mr Blades was a 'Special Inspector' in charge of 47 men'' now according to the story he is only a 'special constable' had he already been demoted before this incident, and this was the final problem that made his sacking inevitable?
It also says that he was advised to plead guilty to dangerous driving avoid a jail term. That to me suggests that this was a serious offence with a lot more to it than the 'Wail' has chosen to print. Jail is only an option for the most serious cases of dangerous driving.It is normally a fine and 9 points.
It says '' For 7 years Mr Blades was a 'Special Inspector' in charge of 47 men'' now according to the story he is only a 'special constable' had he already been demoted before this incident, and this was the final problem that made his sacking inevitable?
It also says that he was advised to plead guilty to dangerous driving avoid a jail term. That to me suggests that this was a serious offence with a lot more to it than the 'Wail' has chosen to print. Jail is only an option for the most serious cases of dangerous driving.It is normally a fine and 9 points.
//Volunteer policeman shouldn't have been prosecuted for trying to stop me, says biker yob who crashed into patrol car when he attempted to cut him off//
It seems that the yob has more common sense than the CPS or the police anyway.
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-34 43255/V oluntee r-polic eman-sh ouldn-t -prosec uted-tr ying-st op-says -biker- yob-cra shed-pa trol-ca r-attem pted-cu t-off.h tml
It seems that the yob has more common sense than the CPS or the police anyway.
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.