Been watching the olympics a lot, sports like gymnastics diving weightlifting and boxing who are reliant on judges scores to win a medal im sure half the judges dont know what their looking at these athletes have been training for 4 years for some numpty judge who i bet hasnt even played the sport their judging on gives them dodgy marks !!! rant over
I think the OP has a valid point, with the 'first past the post' sports (which the Olympics were once about) there is no uncertainty about the winner. Some of these judgements seem on the level of the Eurovision Song Contest. I watched (but not for long) white water canoeing, - cor blimey!
^ That I can believe! How can you compare a chihuahua to an Irish wolfhound? Re. the Olympics there is so much scrutiny of athletes and no one seems to think about checking the judges.
Khandro, you don’t. Dogs are judged against the standard for the breed. The concept is that the dog closest to the breed sample wins......
Now I have A LOT against the way dogs are being bred but that’s a different discussion.
no need to apologise bernie, accepted though. yes judges are judged as are referees etc and while we are at it many sports have referees, umpires etc, who, in many cases are effectively judges.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.