ChatterBank0 min ago
Should The Fact That This Drug-Dealing Killer's Parents Were Not Married, Be A Good Enough Reason For Him Not To Be Deported?
26 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-38 51422/J amaican -killer -thrown -countr y-say-S upreme- Court-j udges-v iolate- human-r ights.h tml
/// Upholding Johnson's appeal, Lady Hale ruled deporting him simply because of the accident of his birth outside wedlock would be unlawfully discriminatory. ///
/// Johnson was in no way responsible for his parents' unmarried status and there could be 'no justification' for deporting him. ///
/// Upholding Johnson's appeal, Lady Hale ruled deporting him simply because of the accident of his birth outside wedlock would be unlawfully discriminatory. ///
/// Johnson was in no way responsible for his parents' unmarried status and there could be 'no justification' for deporting him. ///
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If his parents were married, what on Earth has that got to do with it ?
I keep pointing out that this claim is irrelevant by comparing it to a similar situation where the flaw is more obvious; but this seems not to be considered by you.
But I think my point has been made. The 'if married' thing is as irrelevant as the 'if both Nigerian' thing. It's the law he would not have been deported in both cases had things been different, and the law that he should be if the scenarios are as described. Both 'what if' situations are irrelevant to the actual case but the judges failed to take that into consideration.
I keep pointing out that this claim is irrelevant by comparing it to a similar situation where the flaw is more obvious; but this seems not to be considered by you.
But I think my point has been made. The 'if married' thing is as irrelevant as the 'if both Nigerian' thing. It's the law he would not have been deported in both cases had things been different, and the law that he should be if the scenarios are as described. Both 'what if' situations are irrelevant to the actual case but the judges failed to take that into consideration.
erm you havent kept up with the ins and outs of nationality law eddie
in the good old days - the jus solis said exactly that
you got the nationality from where you were born
I am british even tho my father was born in Cape town and my mother calcutta
and the jus sanguinis was secondary
that is why a little girl you may know who was born to a teacher in Zambia would have been Zambian if the birth were not registered ....
he (J) would have been British under the 1981 act if it had not been repealed by the 2002 act. see the judgement.....
in the good old days - the jus solis said exactly that
you got the nationality from where you were born
I am british even tho my father was born in Cape town and my mother calcutta
and the jus sanguinis was secondary
that is why a little girl you may know who was born to a teacher in Zambia would have been Zambian if the birth were not registered ....
he (J) would have been British under the 1981 act if it had not been repealed by the 2002 act. see the judgement.....
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.