Quizzes & Puzzles7 mins ago
Diana's Funeral
100 Answers
Listening to Earl Spencer being interviewed just now, on the Today Programme, I am still amazed that the powers-to-be made those poor boys walk behind their Mum's coffin. I will never, ever forgive those responsible for that despicable act.
But Spencer didn't appear to do anything to stop it. Considering the excoriating eulogy that he gave, I now find that rather puzzling.
But Spencer didn't appear to do anything to stop it. Considering the excoriating eulogy that he gave, I now find that rather puzzling.
Answers
Trying to stick to the OP ... It was an interview that was conducted as the 20th anniversary of the death is approaching. Earl Spencer chose to use part of the interview to point out that he was lied to re: the boy's desire to walk behind the coffin. Possible reactions: 1) He's a liar. He wasn't lied to. (I think but am not sure that William and/or Harry have said...
14:17 Wed 26th Jul 2017
Trying to stick to the OP ...
It was an interview that was conducted as the 20th anniversary of the death is approaching.
Earl Spencer chose to use part of the interview to point out that he was lied to re: the boy's desire to walk behind the coffin.
Possible reactions:
1) He's a liar. He wasn't lied to. (I think but am not sure that William and/or Harry have said recently that they didn't want to walk behind the coffin, possibly corroborating Earl Spencer's version of events)
2) What he or the boys wanted doesn't matter. They needed to follow protocol.
3) How awful that the boys were made to do something they did not want to do, and that lies were used to push it through.
Whichever is the case, it does not reflect well on the royals. Let's hope that these days things would be different.
It was an interview that was conducted as the 20th anniversary of the death is approaching.
Earl Spencer chose to use part of the interview to point out that he was lied to re: the boy's desire to walk behind the coffin.
Possible reactions:
1) He's a liar. He wasn't lied to. (I think but am not sure that William and/or Harry have said recently that they didn't want to walk behind the coffin, possibly corroborating Earl Spencer's version of events)
2) What he or the boys wanted doesn't matter. They needed to follow protocol.
3) How awful that the boys were made to do something they did not want to do, and that lies were used to push it through.
Whichever is the case, it does not reflect well on the royals. Let's hope that these days things would be different.
I think it may be the exposure in public that is the problem for them. I can well remember being taken (aged - can't remember, possibly about 7 or 8,) to 'pay respect' to a relative who I had visited just the week before (sat on his knee etc.). The coffin was open and occupied the dining-table on which we'd eaten together the week before. OK, not my mum and I do believe that losing your mum is the worst loss of your life (apart from that of a child, which we have suffered, but which, fortunately, is not inevitable) but children are resilient and at a private funeral a child would have been present. I think it is the 'cover your grief, stiff-upper-lip' necessary because of the huge publicity that was the problem.
We walked behind my great granny coffin - didn't want to do it but it was expected as a mark of respect!! I was told to behave and get on with it!!
For the few that are stating how damaging it is for them - do you have your child mental health degree?
Also, as has been pointed out it is expected because of who they are.
For the few that are stating how damaging it is for them - do you have your child mental health degree?
Also, as has been pointed out it is expected because of who they are.