ChatterBank3 mins ago
Germany, The New Beginning.
AFD predicted to get around 13% will Angela flip-flop Merkel listen?
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ world/l ive/201 7/sep/2 4/germa n-elect ions-20 17-ange la-merk el-cdu- spd-afd -live-u pdates
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by -Talbot-. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I would have thought if you were going to quote Yeats in relation to the AFD in the German elections this would have been more apt ( from the same work no less).
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
mikey4444
/// Just to make it clear what the AFD stands for ::
They are climate change deniers.
They want Germany to do a "180 degree" turn regarding the countries role in WW2.
They want to bring back conscription.
They are against same-sex marriage ///
Did any one else notice that mikey conveniently left out their most urgent aim,
They are predominately against 'MASS IMMIGRATION'.
/// Just to make it clear what the AFD stands for ::
They are climate change deniers.
They want Germany to do a "180 degree" turn regarding the countries role in WW2.
They want to bring back conscription.
They are against same-sex marriage ///
Did any one else notice that mikey conveniently left out their most urgent aim,
They are predominately against 'MASS IMMIGRATION'.
//AOG, does the fact that the AfD want to stop mass immigration make all the other items which Mikey listed OK?//
The two things are not correlated. Which is, I think, the point the poster was trying to make. You can share an opinion of mass immigration while disagreeing about climate change or same-sex marriage nonsense
.
The two things are not correlated. Which is, I think, the point the poster was trying to make. You can share an opinion of mass immigration while disagreeing about climate change or same-sex marriage nonsense
.
Yes, I suppose there's a problem with all single-issue groups like AfD and UKIP. To get representation you've got to create a political agenda. Manifestos and all that stuff. My guess is that AfD would split on conventional lines on all other issues (economic policy etc). I voted UKIP whenever I could, but didn't know (and cared less) what their stance was on any issue apart fro EU membership.