ChatterBank1 min ago
What Were They Thinking?
50 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ newsbea t/artic le/4154 2818/do ve-apol ogises- for-rac ist-fac ebook-a dvertis ing-cam paign
In these days of hysteria, and PC over reaction to the slightest transgression from the "correct" view on any given subject, not to mention the gazillion critics of anything that could remotely be considered "ist" in any sense how could anyone think this is is ok? How could it make it to "air"?
In these days of hysteria, and PC over reaction to the slightest transgression from the "correct" view on any given subject, not to mention the gazillion critics of anything that could remotely be considered "ist" in any sense how could anyone think this is is ok? How could it make it to "air"?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.-Talbot-
Dove released a statement which the imagery was supposed to demonstrate the "after" benefit of the product, and that they do not condone any activity or imagery that intentionally insults any audience."
The full advert (which I've only just viewed) actually shows the white woman taking off her top to reveal an Asian (or possibly Latino) woman underneath, which to my view subverts any notion of racism on the part of the advertiser.
Still, it's an incredibly muddle-headed campaign. What the 'after benefit' of the product is, is anyone's guess.
It doesn't make sense.
Dove released a statement which the imagery was supposed to demonstrate the "after" benefit of the product, and that they do not condone any activity or imagery that intentionally insults any audience."
The full advert (which I've only just viewed) actually shows the white woman taking off her top to reveal an Asian (or possibly Latino) woman underneath, which to my view subverts any notion of racism on the part of the advertiser.
Still, it's an incredibly muddle-headed campaign. What the 'after benefit' of the product is, is anyone's guess.
It doesn't make sense.
naomi24
The cynic inside me is whispering that Dove knew exactly what it was up to, and their advertising agency knows that increased brand awareness will offset any negative publicity, because their market research has shown that only a tiny number of women will boycott the brand, compared to those who might try it due to the volume of free publicity it will receive because of this.
Pure guesswork on my part.
The cynic inside me is whispering that Dove knew exactly what it was up to, and their advertising agency knows that increased brand awareness will offset any negative publicity, because their market research has shown that only a tiny number of women will boycott the brand, compared to those who might try it due to the volume of free publicity it will receive because of this.
Pure guesswork on my part.
I think sp1814 is absolutely right. Psychologists discovered a long time ago that people prefer to buy products whose brand name they are familiar with, hence the Specsaver-type ads ("Have you seen the latest Specsaver ad?"). We've spent a day here on AB discussing this advert; that must be success.
Did Dove post the image on Facebook that is in the BBC link, or did they post all the advert?
If they posted all the advert, why did the BBC only show the pic of the white woman and the black woman?
It is still a crap advert and the most probable reason for it is the 'There is no such thing as bad publicity' angle.
If they posted all the advert, why did the BBC only show the pic of the white woman and the black woman?
It is still a crap advert and the most probable reason for it is the 'There is no such thing as bad publicity' angle.
-- answer removed --