Who Needs A Legal System When You Have The Ss ?

[youngmafbog]

Yet another utterly disgraceful case.

Why are heads not rolling?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5574923/Teacher-falsely-accused-groping-students-adopted-child-removed.html

[jackthehat]

LoL....

[naomi24]

Eddie, //We can only judge on what few details have been made public, and those details could be totally wrong for all we know. //

The man has been exonerated. What other details do you want?

[ummmm]

We don't even know the age of the child.

[youngmafbog]

"You really ought to tag ".......according to the Daily Mail" on the end there. "

https://www.tes.com/news/school-news/breaking-news/watch-utter-devastation-experienced-teachers-subjected-malicious --- According to the Times Educational supplement.

[jackthehat]

The TES report is about Malicious Allegations within the school environment.
The DM have run with a different version laying the blame squarely at the door of Social Services.....that's the version you have chosen to swallow.

[naomi24]

jackthehat. the TES report begins with the case in question.

//Teacher lost adopted child because of malicious allegation, and his wife was forced to sign statement saying she wouldn't let him have unsupervised contact with their remaining child

Teachers have been speaking out about the "devastating" impact of malicious allegations made by students, including one case where a teacher lost an adopted child after being subject to a false accusation.//

[EDDIE51]

For all we know ,while the man may have been cleared of the original charges ,more charges may be in process. The Daily Wail is hardly known for it's unbiased news reporting.

[naomi24]

Eddie, for all we know you might be talking straight out of the back of your head - again. Read the TES.

[andres]

Trying to get this news article into perspective. Teacher adopts a child and is given adoption leave. Whilst on leave accusations are made and then he is suspended for 12 months whilst investigations are carried out. In the meantime the adopted child is settling in with the family.Then although the allegations are proved to be untrue the child is taken away.Furthermore Social Services state that the child will not be returned to the family.
We don't know how old the child is but can you imagine the devastating effect that being snatched away from loving, caring parents will have had .Also what about the fact that the teacher was banned from being alone with his teenage son?Does anyone know whether this has been overturned?That boy will have had his life turned upside down as well. The accusers should be named and shamed . Everyone at the school will know who they are . I know SS have to take many unpleasant decisions but I don't understand why in this case ,where the accusations have been proved untrue,why this child has been taken away. Surely it is in the best interests of the child to be returned to the family?

[ummmm]

The child was taken away before the accusations were proved false.

[andres]

Ummmm--All I can say is I just hope the child didn't have enough time with the family to get used to them.

[Togo]

//"My case delivers a very strong message to men who are thinking about being teachers,” Harris said.
"There is a narrative now in safeguarding in schools as much as anywhere else that every male employee is viewed through the lens of being a potential pervert. Every male teacher is a potential child abuser.
“We know that 22 percent of male teachers have false allegations made about them at some point in their career.”//

You are right Jackdaw. No sane male would want the job. Perhaps that is the "twisted" aim of our social engineers. What do you suppose is the breakdown of men and women who run the SS in the "child care"(oxymoron) branch?
Not just the mail reporting, just the only mainstream British publication. It has even been reported in Bolivia!

http://newsare.net/country/Bolivia/&nw=1608299

https://www.rt.com/uk/423056-sex-abuse-teenager-adoption/

[bednobs]

maybe the question should be "who needs a trained social services staff, when you have ABers who know everything?"

[steg]

Maybe the child didn’t want to go back

[bednobs]

the actual question makes no sense anyway as clearly the OP does not know what he's talking about (mind you, when did that ever stop any of us on AB?)
social services cannot take children away - the legal system is needed to do that. Children cannot be removed without a court order

[pixie374]

The child is not a "thing" to be returned. Even if they are wrong, it doesn't mean it is in the child's best interests to be disrupted again and taken back.