Islam Strikes Once Again.

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6089987/One-killed-two-wounded-knife-attack-Paris.html

Luckily this savage won't be carrying out any more attacks, one could say "justice has been carried out".

[sanmac]

Nothing.

[naomi24]

andy-hughes, //I think it bears repeating//

An awful lot of mental illness and psychosis in one section of society then. Products of the imagination and preferred world views don’t bear repeating. Reality does.

There’s a message in R&S for you.

[Spicerack]

Be honest with yourself, Andy.
If, say, NF members were murdering people every day of the week, no way would you be repeating your ridiculous mantra, 'It's nothing to do with the National Front, it's just murderers using the organisation as cover'.
In fact, if anyone else suggested it you'd laugh them off the site.

[Baldric]

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

[naomi24]

spath, As you say, they are unrelated. Hence they are not relevant to this thread.

[Theland]

Dog poo on the road outside. ISIS claim responsibility.

[naomi24]

Why indeed?

[vetuste_ennemi]

Isn't it surprising that an important part of forensic science is "profiling"? (They make popular TV series about it: "Waking the Dead", anyone?)

Here's an example: isn't the typical (NOT THE ONLY, GEDDIT?) serial killer a white, middle-class man between the ages of twenty-three and forty-five with a higher than average IQ? This "evidence-based" observation (I'm quoting - can't remember the source) doesn't elicit the same automatic chorus of censure by weasels bleating (is that a mixed metaphor, VE?) that "not all..." and "you're tarring with a broad brush", and "the observation is divisive and - worse - racist" along with its extraordinary conclusion that white males fitting the profile, but not themselves serial killers, will be incited by the science to become such.

[vetuste_ennemi]

One answer to Spathiphyllum's question '[If] this man was a “known radicalised” ...why not lock him up for being a nutter?' is "that's not who we are".

[andy-hughes]

Spicerack - // Be honest with yourself, Andy.
If, say, NF members were murdering people every day of the week, no way would you be repeating your ridiculous mantra, 'It's nothing to do with the National Front, it's just murderers using the organisation as cover'.
In fact, if anyone else suggested it you'd laugh them off the site. //

Interesting that you assume you know what I would think, and what makes me laugh - in fact of course you know neither.

[andy-hughes]

Naomi - // An awful lot of mental illness and psychosis in one section of society then. //


That can be attributed to the sheer numbers of Muslims - the degenerate proportion must consequently by higher.


Products of the imagination and preferred world views don’t bear repeating. Reality does. //

I don't mind when you repeat products of your imagination and preferred world views, or your own version of reality.

We're all entitled to think what we wish - your 'theory' has as much, or indeed as little as mine. You just offer it with a larger degree of certainty, based on what, I have no idea. You would say 'evidence' but as I say so often, we are not 'taken over yet' - what's the hold-up?

[sanmac]

AH, my response at 2212 meant that I merely wanted to demonstrate to you how I can say nothing using far fewer letters, words, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, cut and pastes, obfuscations, and various techniques of verbal tap-dancing and moon-walking than what you do.

[naomi24]

andy-hughes, //That can be attributed to the sheer numbers of Muslims - the degenerate proportion must consequently by higher.//

Oh dear. You’ve blundered again. You’re clearly unaware that worldwide Christians far outnumber Muslims.

This country is home to an estimated 25000 people who potentially pose a threat to our security - none of them mentally-ill Christian degenerates whose numbers, by your reckoning, should far exceed those of their Muslim counterparts.

Checking your facts is recommended.

[sanmac]

In my earlier post this morning I thought that I was responding to the "shaking of hands" thread; however, it is still appropriate to this one.