News2 mins ago
No Wall, No Deal,
During an interview broadcast on Thursday’s edition of the Fox News Channel’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” Vice President Mike Pence declared that “We will have no deal without a wall.”
Pence said, "The president’s made it clear, we’re here to make a deal. But it’s a deal that’s going to result in achieving real gains on border security, and you have no border security without the wall. We will have no deal without a wall. The president’s made it very clear, no wall, no deal.”
Will Trump get his way?
Pence said, "The president’s made it clear, we’re here to make a deal. But it’s a deal that’s going to result in achieving real gains on border security, and you have no border security without the wall. We will have no deal without a wall. The president’s made it very clear, no wall, no deal.”
Will Trump get his way?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Trump has tweeted;
'I often stated, “One way or the other, Mexico is going to pay for the Wall.” This has never changed. Our new deal with Mexico (and Canada), the USMCA, is so much better than the old, very costly & anti-USA NAFTA deal, that just by the money we save, MEXICO IS PAYING FOR THE WALL!'
Why does nobody on the left understand that, or do they not want to know and admit it ?
'I often stated, “One way or the other, Mexico is going to pay for the Wall.” This has never changed. Our new deal with Mexico (and Canada), the USMCA, is so much better than the old, very costly & anti-USA NAFTA deal, that just by the money we save, MEXICO IS PAYING FOR THE WALL!'
Why does nobody on the left understand that, or do they not want to know and admit it ?
The electoral college vote was on ntroduced at the start to stop large constituencies from forever gaining power. It specifically stops places such as NYC, California and Illinois from taking over the country. It does actually (apparently) give the people the final say rather than large groups of people from one area dominating politics. Apparently (again lol) the founding fathers sort of realised that a few larger states could undermine democracy. Which t what the democrates are now proposing to do but changing the electoral role role.
Actually I’ve been reading a few US posts about this and there have been a few funny posts.
One was that Trump said the Obamas have a wall round their Manson for security which is only right and proper. He just wants to build a slightly bigger one for the country. I just thought that ‘slightly bigger’ was very funny.
And republicans are saying if you don’t want a wall or security on the border. Take off your front doors and gates and see how well not hav8 g basic security works for you.
One was that Trump said the Obamas have a wall round their Manson for security which is only right and proper. He just wants to build a slightly bigger one for the country. I just thought that ‘slightly bigger’ was very funny.
And republicans are saying if you don’t want a wall or security on the border. Take off your front doors and gates and see how well not hav8 g basic security works for you.
The wall explained and it's nothing to do with "racism" (or cost);
https:/
https:/
he has delegated to a negotiating committee
his son in law of course and Mike Pence
and they presumably will negiotitate a deal of some sort
The two houses are there to control the powers of the president so trying to do it without ( invoking emergency powers ) will perhaps not be the way forward....
seems a bit seventeenth century - an absolute monarch trying to raise money without the consent of parliament
his son in law of course and Mike Pence
and they presumably will negiotitate a deal of some sort
The two houses are there to control the powers of the president so trying to do it without ( invoking emergency powers ) will perhaps not be the way forward....
seems a bit seventeenth century - an absolute monarch trying to raise money without the consent of parliament
// 'I often stated, “One way or the other, Mexico is going to pay for the Wall.”//
yeah but no but - we are now two years into the presidency and we are now used to what is X on Monday may well not be X on Tuesday.
The problem with repudiating deals is that the new deal may be suddenly - - - repudiated and you cant really then plan for the future
yeah but no but - we are now two years into the presidency and we are now used to what is X on Monday may well not be X on Tuesday.
The problem with repudiating deals is that the new deal may be suddenly - - - repudiated and you cant really then plan for the future
Douglas; //He should be investing in attack dragons, that'll keep them out.//
As in my link above, the wall isn't going to stop anybody doing anything but enter the U.S. by the official ports of entry. It's not to keep people out but to make them come in by the official method. In other words, nobody who has a right of access will be excluded.
Do you have difficulty with that?
As in my link above, the wall isn't going to stop anybody doing anything but enter the U.S. by the official ports of entry. It's not to keep people out but to make them come in by the official method. In other words, nobody who has a right of access will be excluded.
Do you have difficulty with that?
Latest Posts
News4 mins ago
Sir Keir Starmer Under, Fresh...
News5 mins ago
Crosswords8 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles9 mins ago
ChatterBank16 mins ago
