Food & Drink4 mins ago
Ali Carter
I have just watched the VR of the incident the other night in the match between Ali Carter and John Higgins.Carter plays the white from the bottom end of the table towards baulk to hit the Yellow ball.He clearly misses the object ball and the young woman referee calls foul he tells her he hit it and the foul call is revoked.So is he blatantly cheating or does he need glasses?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by grumpy01. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Yes, he should've gone to Specsavers & Ms Bozhilova needed to stick with her - correct - decision.
"Blatantly cheating"? Probably not, but perhaps an adrenaline rush caused his response? I'm trying to be charitable, he's always struck me as an honest player.
He'd surely know (back of the brain, subconsciously) that the shot would be shown in replay to have been a foul & therefore must've believed he was right.
VAR for snooker? Hmm...
The shot in question can be seen here - https:/ /tinyur l.com/s fd6otr
"Blatantly cheating"? Probably not, but perhaps an adrenaline rush caused his response? I'm trying to be charitable, he's always struck me as an honest player.
He'd surely know (back of the brain, subconsciously) that the shot would be shown in replay to have been a foul & therefore must've believed he was right.
VAR for snooker? Hmm...
The shot in question can be seen here - https:/
At the time, the commentators asked if the second referee could see the replays. They were showing the second referee (who could hear them) and he shook his head in response.
When the system used to re-place the balls has failed, I have seen them use the monitor on one of the cameras.
The ref should have stuck to her guns.
When the system used to re-place the balls has failed, I have seen them use the monitor on one of the cameras.
The ref should have stuck to her guns.
I saw the incident live. There was no way that the yellow ball was struck, either on the way past it first time or on the way back. The referee was wrong to reverse her decision. I don't think Carter was deliberately cheating. He obviously believed he had struck the ball. But that's why sports have referees.
On a point of pedantry:
//Carter plays the white from the bottom end of the table towards baulk to hit the Yellow ball//
This is the second time this week I have heard the "black" end of the table being referred to as the bottom end. I've always understood the black end to be the top end of the table with the baulk end being the bottom (or "the long grass" during a safety exchange early in the frame when plenty of reds are left).
On a point of pedantry:
//Carter plays the white from the bottom end of the table towards baulk to hit the Yellow ball//
This is the second time this week I have heard the "black" end of the table being referred to as the bottom end. I've always understood the black end to be the top end of the table with the baulk end being the bottom (or "the long grass" during a safety exchange early in the frame when plenty of reds are left).
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.