Quizzes & Puzzles10 mins ago
Trump's Executive Order
115 Answers
I think we may be about to witness something extraordinary with regards to the USA election.
It would appear that two years ago, Trump declared a “national emergency” to deal with foreign and domestic election interference. It was enacted under an Executive Order called “Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election” and was signed by him on 12th September 2018:
https:/ /www.wh itehous e.gov/p residen tial-ac tions/e xecutiv e-order -imposi ng-cert ain-san ctions- event-f oreign- interfe rence-u nited-s tates-e lection /
In essence, this gives him unprecedented powers to investigate and prosecute electoral fraud.
There's a long and detailed article here that goes into much more depth about it:
https:/ /www.di stribut ednews. com/474 016.htm l
It would appear that two years ago, Trump declared a “national emergency” to deal with foreign and domestic election interference. It was enacted under an Executive Order called “Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election” and was signed by him on 12th September 2018:
https:/
In essence, this gives him unprecedented powers to investigate and prosecute electoral fraud.
There's a long and detailed article here that goes into much more depth about it:
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by birdie1971. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.With the various lawsuits falling flat, we're now apparently moving to plan C, which is to directly court the various officials in the key states that can overturn or refuse to certify the results, and get them to do just that.
All based on zero evidence of course, so just a straightforward attempt to overturn the election result on the grounds that he lost.
All based on zero evidence of course, so just a straightforward attempt to overturn the election result on the grounds that he lost.
// Nice to see Jim back to his absolutely positive, bullish best.
He put a brave face on it on election night but one could tell he was thoroughly deflated, like all Biden supporters, as he wearily wended his way to bed.
And then a miracle happened. ... //
Spicerack's post isn't completely wrong but certainly an exaggeration. I went to bed on election night disheartened that it was so close, or at least so much closer than I'd hoped. That's not at all the same as feeling deflated and, in a sense, resigned to a Trump victory. And, besides, it was already known that Biden would have secured a majority of postal ballots, and that, in many states, these ballots would be counted later. The idea that there was a "miracle", then, is fanciful.
He put a brave face on it on election night but one could tell he was thoroughly deflated, like all Biden supporters, as he wearily wended his way to bed.
And then a miracle happened. ... //
Spicerack's post isn't completely wrong but certainly an exaggeration. I went to bed on election night disheartened that it was so close, or at least so much closer than I'd hoped. That's not at all the same as feeling deflated and, in a sense, resigned to a Trump victory. And, besides, it was already known that Biden would have secured a majority of postal ballots, and that, in many states, these ballots would be counted later. The idea that there was a "miracle", then, is fanciful.
I should also like to say that I don't share birdie's assessment of the Mueller report. In particular, the idea that Trump would have ever been impeached based on it is clearly nonsense, ignoring political realities that ought to have been made clear in 2020, if they weren't already: a lot of Americans love Trump, adore him, worship him, and Republicans are far too mindful of that to ever have voted to impeach. The entire saga of Impeachment was a farce, then, because its outcome was predetermined not from the evidence but from the politics, but if you listen to what Mueller said it is clear that, were Trump not protected by the office of Presidency, he would have pressed charges on Obstruction of Justice himself. The only reason he did not is that Mueller determined that the decision to charge a President with a crime is one for Congress alone.
'It ain't over 'til the fat lady sings', Zuckerberg enters the fray;
https:/ /www.ex press.c o.uk/ne ws/worl d/13629 45/Dona ld-Trum p-lates t-news- US-elec tion-re sult-20 20-Face book-Ma rk-Zuck erberg- legal-c halleng e
https:/
khandeo
The Zuck enters the fray. There is an express article which is so bizarre - I cd have written it.
the theme may be - Zuck contributed $1/2 bn to someone
They used it as specified which some people dont like
and may be against electoral law - or not. we dont know.
And someone else is suing
which doesnt amount to much
The Zuck enters the fray. There is an express article which is so bizarre - I cd have written it.
the theme may be - Zuck contributed $1/2 bn to someone
They used it as specified which some people dont like
and may be against electoral law - or not. we dont know.
And someone else is suing
which doesnt amount to much