ChatterBank54 mins ago
Capital Punishment
I am generally opposed to Capital Punishment since it authenticates the taking of life. But my convictions are sometimes sorely tried, as in the case of the unspeakable *** who set fire to these three lovely people's house, killing all three.
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-engla nd-nott inghams hire-63 717024
Should we reintroduce it for particularly heinous murders ?
https:/
Should we reintroduce it for particularly heinous murders ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.remember that ian brady asked for the death penalty rather than life improsonment and attempted to bargain information about his victims for it.... a lot of particularly nasty murderers ask for the death penalty too...
regardless as jno says absolute proof does not exist so if we reintroduce it then we're guaranteeing that at least some innocent people will be executed by the state
regardless as jno says absolute proof does not exist so if we reintroduce it then we're guaranteeing that at least some innocent people will be executed by the state
thinking Fred West & Harold Shipman
you know the wise Dr Shipman committed soodle-side for.....
good pension reasons?
if he waited until he was NHS pension age, with a stroke of a pen, the minister can deprive him of it ( his pension)
But if you DDDDIIIIIEEEEEE! before your pension is drawn/vested, then your widow inherits benefits ( under than scheme, which is long long gone).
Just saying and er trying to educate
you know the wise Dr Shipman committed soodle-side for.....
good pension reasons?
if he waited until he was NHS pension age, with a stroke of a pen, the minister can deprive him of it ( his pension)
But if you DDDDIIIIIEEEEEE! before your pension is drawn/vested, then your widow inherits benefits ( under than scheme, which is long long gone).
Just saying and er trying to educate
The USA death penalty is far more expensive than keeping a prisoner locked up for life, so it doesn't save money https:/ /www.le g.state .nv.us/ App/NEL IS/REL/ 76th201 1/Exhib itDocum ent/Ope nExhibi tDocume nt?exhi bitId=1 7686&am p;fileD ownload Name=h0 41211ab 501_pes cetta.p df
A jury would be far less likely to find the accused guilty of murder if they knew they were handing out a death penalty - what if they were wrong? So, more murderers found guilty of manslaughter.
When a person commits murder they believe they have the right to kill, that the victim deserves to die. How is that different to capital punishment?
Albert Pierrepoint became opposed to capital punishment claiming it was 'nothing more than revenge'.
A jury would be far less likely to find the accused guilty of murder if they knew they were handing out a death penalty - what if they were wrong? So, more murderers found guilty of manslaughter.
When a person commits murder they believe they have the right to kill, that the victim deserves to die. How is that different to capital punishment?
Albert Pierrepoint became opposed to capital punishment claiming it was 'nothing more than revenge'.
It is a question of belief/faith that the dead don't know they're dead. The majority of humanity believes in some kind of continuation, and this seems supported by many NDEs reported. It may be that after the deed has been done the executed individual thanks you profusely for getting them in to heaven that bit quicker.