to general annoyance
I insisted on silence intermittently VEEEERY intermittently
and did a better commentary myself
Olusaga disappointing as a historian, he is paid to say - blah blah OR ask someone else, not my subject
instead
he told of us of the black and afro-caribbean contribution to the coronation rite
er
well if the rite is 1000y old and untouched, then the answer is nil, isnt it ?
The Beeb sent him back to his books after I pointed this out
BUT
instead of the usual fluffy sneering at brit tradition 6-12 am coronation day
the Beeb suddenly veered into
" wot it all mean den?" James Mates
" how day, how day squeeze william and mary into one seat den (1689)? how day do that?"
why day have priest dare ? where he come from foo?
and finally
Greek singing Greek for Phil da greek - but where da Huns singing Der Horst Wessel song, for phils SS chumz? - day all dead or sumfing ?
I thought some commando members of AB had stormed and taken the commentary boxes - in nomine populi docti (*)
If you U tube - coronation rite - - - - or
coronation ritual - there is quite a lot on the ritual significance.
800-1500 (AD that is ! not GMT) It is OK - a bit weak on theology and significance of 1600s. No one on the internet has done 1650 English protestant theology ( or understood it). Hooker and all that.
(james I last monarch to be crowned in a Latin rite 1603 - no I think it was Elizabeth 1558. No bishop inherited under Mary I wd do it in English)
someone asked for chrissakes, someone asked