Donate SIGN UP

More Tory Sleaze

Avatar Image
Geoffrey13 | 04:57 Fri 11th Aug 2023 | News
33 Answers
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-66469317

Still, she does "deeply regret" it, so that's all right then.

I presume I will now suffer the same stream of abuse which the Ab bullies aim at Gulliver.


Gravatar

Answers

21 to 33 of 33rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Geoffrey13. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
good job there is no Labour sleaze....hang on!

that is because Lab dont have their hands in the Treasury till
just wait, their turn will come
Looks like Tory Central Office has instructed TTT to rubbish this thread.
...Porthos is here, just need Athos now!
"Looks like Tory Central Office has instructed TTT to rubbish this thread.'

nope, youve done that all by yourself...
Hymie @ 10.39.He does not need to get instructions from Tory central office to talk rubbish ...It just comes naturally to him .
Shell’s worth is about £162,000,000,0000.000.

If my maths is correct her shareholding is worth about 0.00005%.

Yes should have been declared, but it’s a stretch to call this sleaze.
Sorry, couple of misplaced stops.

I meant, of course, to type £162,000,000,000.
Hi,Geoff....oh,sorry...Bye,Geoff..are you any relation to DaveInScotland,by the way?
all 4 Trollsketeers, Bingo!
I presume I will now suffer the same stream of abuse which the Ab bullies aim at Gulliver.

note: have brought own cross and nails
Sounds like the portfolio manager wasn't told to keep her informed of significant rises. She probably should have checked for herself considering her department but is there evidence it affected her decision making in her professional role?
but is there evidence it affected her decision making in her professional role?

yeah but no but - that wd be a reason for resignation ( obviously corrupt) (*)
and THAT is why you should declare an interest and recuse ( oneself) from the decision
BUT knowing how to run industry X may be of value when you are "Minister of production of X" and surrounded by Mandarins who have read classics at uni

(*) and THAT is why a judge has more strict reasons to recuse himself on a case because if he IS actively involved, he has to go, lose pension, fire the servants, sell the (big) house etcc
when a council I was on ( had been elected to) decided to commission a painting of Lord Foppington-Poncey to hang on its walls, painted by Mr Far-2-expensive,

I said ( declared) Ay hev to recuse myself from this discussion as I have commissioned Mr Far-2-expensive to paint a piccy of MEEEEEEE!

Needless to say all the councillors came up after and said how much for a private commission.....It was an interesting start to my finance leadership where I tripled the capital base of that council in 6 y . Councillors (such as Sqad will know) were less grateful than jealous

21 to 33 of 33rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

More Tory Sleaze

Answer Question >>