Bowburn And Parkhill Green Matters Quiz
Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It depends what you call 'lightly' - the comprehensive destruction of his career and personal reputation, several years of lost liberty, and the prospect of life where everyone he meets will be thinking only of what he did, and the endless consequences for an innocent family of an innocent woman.
It may not be the full sentence he was given, but I'm not sure it's 'getting off lightly' either.
TTT - // 12:31 He got off lightly for takling a life. He still has a sizeable chunk of his life left. More than can be said for Ms Steenkamp. //
That applies to anyone who lives one second or more longer than their victim.
My point is, it's how that life is going to be lived that is the point, not the obvious and pointless observation that the murderer remans alive and the victim does not - that's how murder works.
Just thought a discusion might ensue.
yup - their legal system is Roman Dutch and stayed as such while Holland went onto Napoleonic Code and then passed onto something else
Princess Hooli-arner was actually sent to do Auncient Law at Stellenbosch which I think was Roman Dutch. ( Juliana)
Now this morning, R4 had a legal expert trying to tell us what went on. Clearly they dont have manslaughter by gross negligence which is a common law thing. Now the SPanith do have homocidio doloso as a parallel to Manslaughter
But SHE said it was 'dolus eventualis' ( erk? what?) and that he must have foreseen death as a result of hammering four bullets into a closed bog door.
and THEN said on appeal - they upped it to murder. which I dont think you can do in English Law....
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.