ChatterBank1 min ago
Beware The Consequences Of Pedestrian-Rage
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I felt that too, Zacs given the fact the judge insisted it was a designated cycle path despite the police not finding 'legal' confirmation of that. My experience of law is slight enough not to matter/register but my faith in it has always been that it will get everything right that is in its consideration - well, up to now :(
btw, I wonder who else noticed that the victim wore a shoulder bag on her left shoulder i.e. the side nearer to Grey? Did the victim think Grey was going for her bag and possibly leave the pavement to avoid it being taken, or did it unbalance the victim once she was in the road?
As I posted at the start of this thread - so many unanswered questions.
As I posted at the start of this thread - so many unanswered questions.
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-1 1903555 /Family -childl ike-par tially- blind-w oman-sa ys-vuln erabili ties-ig nored-j udge.ht ml
The first report of Grey's family showing some support of her.
The first report of Grey's family showing some support of her.
An interesting video where a (verified) barrister discusses the Judge's comments. Relevance about the alleged "cycle path" is at 3:50.
The Judge said "This was, I think, a shared path for cyclists and pedestrians that allowed them to go round the busy ring road." The judge also said "The vital point is I am sure you knew that cyclists used the path."
Even in the summing up the Judge states his opinion that he thinks the pavement was a legally defined cycle path, despite lack of public record in confirmation of this. That is so wrong in my mind.
The Judge said "This was, I think, a shared path for cyclists and pedestrians that allowed them to go round the busy ring road." The judge also said "The vital point is I am sure you knew that cyclists used the path."
Even in the summing up the Judge states his opinion that he thinks the pavement was a legally defined cycle path, despite lack of public record in confirmation of this. That is so wrong in my mind.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.