Starmer & Lammy A Marriage Made In...
News6 mins ago
NB for the pedants and nit pickers there may be exceptions to the suggestions below, I will mention them if I think about them, if I do not that just means I cannot think of an exception. This list is by no means exhaustive. You may note that many of the suggestions apply to any religion. Feel free to add your own suggestions.
1. Automatic rejection of any immigrant or asylum seeker that is Muslim.
2. No accommodation for the rituals or demands of any religion in schools. Religious education as a subject is allowed but must cover all main religions. All current religious schools to be converted or closed down.
3. No provision for any religion in the work place and no practicing the rituals of any religion. Employers can instantly dismiss any transgression.
4. Any extreme preaching (current UK definition) will result in instant arrest and internment until trial. If guilty 10 years to life no remission.
5. No Hijab or burka, full face coverings allowed in public.
6. No preaching except within the building designated for the purpose of the religion.
7. The production and supply of Halaal and Kosher meat would be illegal. Both Islam and Judaism have provision in their scriptures for this.
8. No religious “courts” , “councils” or other pseudo bodies to be allowed.
9. Local authorities and government generally are barred from any sort of special religious provision.
10. Any Islamic TV or radio channel must be closed down, any transgression should be treated as in 4.
11. Demonstrations are allowed but any extremist talk or placard will be treated as in 4.
12. Close down any jihadist web sites, blogs, Videos and prosecute those responsible where possible as in 4.
13. Block Imams access to any place of education, prisons, forces etc
14. Any attempt at implementing anything from sharia law to be prosecuted as in 4.
15. Allow no new mosques unless an old mosque is decommissioned. The total number of mosques to not exceed what it is now.
Khandro - // Tommy Robinson said a lot of that years ago. It goes someway beyond what he said & he got locked up & placed among Muslims for it. //
Your starry-eyed perception of 'Tommy Robinson' is clouding your judgement, again.
He was not locked up for what he said - that's free speech.
He was locked up for a series of criminal offences, for which he was charged, convicted, and sentenced.
But don't let simple facts get in the way of your hero worshsip.
a-h- The establishment were out to get him somehow, in the end it was contempt of court - 9 months but it was quashed after 3.
I don't agree with all of TTT's list, but I agree with some of it & so would TR, & more & more people of late are beginning to see the light, you might be the last one in the dark.
Naomi - //
/He was locked up for a series of criminal offences, for which he was charged, convicted, and sentenced.//
He was still right about what he said though. Criminal convictions don't change that. //
No-one is suggesting that it does.
But neither does it make what he said, the reason for why he was locked up, which is what Khandro's starry-eyed post wants to state.
The truth of what he said is debatable, the crimes for which he was imprisoned, are not, so let's not try and pretend that one caused the other.
Khandro - // a-h- The establishment were out to get him somehow, in the end it was contempt of court - 9 months but it was quashed after 3. //
Nonsense.
'Tommy Robinson' is entirely the architect of his own misforutnes.
He actively seeks conflict, and to put himself at odds with the systems of law and order, so he can be correctly punished, and paint himself as a martyr and prophet without honour.
// I don't agree with all of TTT's list, but I agree with some of it & so would TR, & more & more people of late are beginning to see the light, you might be the last one in the dark. //
As usual, you resort to the same sort of cyber-head-shaking patience with the terminally ignorant that people like you love to adopt with anyone who doesn't see things the way you do.
I don't agree with your opinions, but I offer you the respect of holding them without me loftily pitying you in response.
I don't possess that level of arrogance - that's probably why I am not so hero-worshiping as you, of similarly minded people like 'Tommy Robinson', who also likes to think he has a monopoly on seeing into the future.
naomi - // Andy Hughes, you said that, not me. I haven't pretended anything. //
By adopting a defence for 'Tommy Robinson' because you believe what he says, and suggesting a connection between his speeches and his behaviour, is to pretend a connection.
You can deny it, and I am sure you will, but you imagine the connection to be valid, and it's not.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.