Worried About Leaving My Cat Alone For...
Animals & Nature1 min ago
Why are they so easy? I once saw one that said Who was the first landlord of The Queen Vic
A: Dirty Den B: Desperate Dan C:Dennis Nordon.
Even if you do not watch Eastenders you know the answer. Do they make it easy to fool the public into thinking that they will win? Or do most people think I am not entering that at �1 a call because I don't stand a chance?
How many people actually phone these things? Obviously enough to cover the cost of a �10k car, but do any ABers out there try their luck.
(you can tell that work is quiet for me and that I am bored)
No best answer has yet been selected by londondave. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Any competition to win money / prizes over a certain value (not sure what value) will be classed as gambling / gaming or playing a lottery unless the competition involves 'skill.'
Gaming and lotteries are as others have rightly pointed out legally regulated and have to meet all sorts of conditions that it would be impractical for these programmes to meet - such as obtaining gaming licences.
Therefore the correct answering of a question means that this is a skill based competiton (even if the amount of skill required is minuscule) and therefore exempt from such regulation.
The questions are made as simple as possible to maximise the number of people likely to enter - most text / phone competitions have a cost above that of the standard rate and so more money is made in proportion to the more entrants that there are. Personally I don't enter them. But clearly enough people do to make the running of such competitions worthwhile...
It's funny (well not really) that you mention that. I have in the last couple of weeks received text messages with web links to porn sites. Yesterday I received one from a woman called Mandy offering all kinds of services if I wanted to phone her at home and it wasn't a mobile number of one of my friends messing about either.
I show them to my gf as I can't understand why I keep receiving them (I haven't entered comps, but might have included number on a website for goods/services that I ordered). But even she is getting a bit wary of why I keep receiving them.
Every second programme has got a comp. now, which must mean it's a nice little earner. What happens if there's more money in than the prize gives out? There is little info. about these - how many enter, etc. so that you know odds against winning, etc. Obviously automated computers have made the draws possible and these must cost, but presumably a lot of programmes use the same one. One day-time programme used to ask you to state 'town' as I suspect the answers were restricted to a region, thus giving a 'buggins' turn' to entrants.
To Octavious: Ever considered it might be someone you know, who doesn't like you, who is giving your 'phone no. so that you get what seem to be unsolicited calls. All unsolicited calls can charge you I believe. These come from auto. computers. Watch your mobile 'phone bills.
flaming - read andy hughes and lillabet's answers again.
The TV companies do not have to give any 'odds of winning / how many entries etc.', as it is not a 'lottery'. It is a 'competition of skill'. The prize is awarded to the person who answers the question correctly. Where more than one correct answer is received, the winner is allowed to be decided by drawing one entry from all the correct entries (this can be done electronically).
Yes, with such p�ss easy questions, they are effectively running a lottery, but are not subject to the strict rules of lotteries because of this so called, 'element of skill'.
londondave, in your original sample question, was the answer C. Dennis Norden ?
One more thing. When you are asked to 'state town' in your answer, it is more likely so that twhen they announce the winner, they can say it was won by 'Margaret Smith in Glenrothes' or 'Wayne Sadb�stard from Solihull'.
You seem very distrustful, flaming, though you're probably right if that dodgy Lorraine Kelly has anything to do with it. ;o)