Question Author
Mrs C, red, dot, etc ...
I do feel strongly.
I typed it all out because I wanted to show the sceptics that my view of Amanda's innocence is not based on sensational journalism, and it is not because I think she's attractive ...
It is based on a thorough look at each bit of evidence ...
... and the deep flaws in every bit of evidence.
Bit by bit, the Prosecution experts have conceded that their own evidence if flawed.
Okay, it might be the wrong knife.
Those are not Raffaele's footprints.
The cleaning fluid receipts never existed.
The DNA samples were contaminated.
The prosecution witnesses contradict each other.
And so on, and so on.
In the UK, the Judge would have probably stopped the Trial by now, and ordered an enquiry into the Police conducy.
But Amanda is stuck in some foreign hell-hole, where the Police beat her, to force her to wrongly point the finger at a suspect whom they had already arrested (Lumumba) and who was also completelt innocent.
The world should not forget her.
And when she is acquitted, the Italian Police must be held up as the incompetent, corrupt shower that they are.
Well ... that's what I think !