Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
The Spare Ed - Warts and All
133 Answers
To help me out, and possibly have a bit of fun, I thought we could all have a go at designing me a Twitter profile image.
Phallic entries will be fed to the hamsters.
The judges will be completely biased and unfair - they are open to bribes.
All the best,
Spare Ed
Phallic entries will be fed to the hamsters.
The judges will be completely biased and unfair - they are open to bribes.
All the best,
Spare Ed
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by AB Editor. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.ED-
I undersatnd how it is SUPPOSED to work...but that does not seem to be the case lately
You can't expect me .and others to believe that leggy had been reported for what he may have said on THIS thread..??
And can you explain WHY he has lost the use of so many names all of a sudden?
Knowing how complacent ABers say they are about reporting....I somehow find this all very dubious.
I undersatnd how it is SUPPOSED to work...but that does not seem to be the case lately
You can't expect me .and others to believe that leggy had been reported for what he may have said on THIS thread..??
And can you explain WHY he has lost the use of so many names all of a sudden?
Knowing how complacent ABers say they are about reporting....I somehow find this all very dubious.
I wasn't around to see anything removed - or even to read what was said - but I certainly find a degree of unfairness.
The Ed said that the removing of names is up to him, and I'd just like to ask why it always seems to be Leggy who goes, even when he's behaving himself? No one seems to notice the sensible answers he gives in other topics, and surely, after all teh horrible verbal abuse he's taken on CB, he entitled to retalliate now and again. Wouldn't anyone?
I don't agree with anyone being deliberately abusive to another, but certain names've been allowed to remain, despite their posts being threatening and perverted. What explanation is there for this?
The Ed said that the removing of names is up to him, and I'd just like to ask why it always seems to be Leggy who goes, even when he's behaving himself? No one seems to notice the sensible answers he gives in other topics, and surely, after all teh horrible verbal abuse he's taken on CB, he entitled to retalliate now and again. Wouldn't anyone?
I don't agree with anyone being deliberately abusive to another, but certain names've been allowed to remain, despite their posts being threatening and perverted. What explanation is there for this?