ChatterBank3 mins ago
art exam
13 Answers
We didn't even have an official invidulator, jsut our art teacher, who was helping people and on several occaisons we were left alone for up to 2 minutes with no supervision.
Plus people were allowed on the computer and into the computer room next door to retrieve their stuff, is this allowed?
Plus people were allowed on the computer and into the computer room next door to retrieve their stuff, is this allowed?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mollykins. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Depends whether it was classed as an exam or a teacher-assessment. The latter isn't so strict in terms of conditions and it could be that your teacher thought you wouldn't understand the term (because they're a bit dim that way, are teachers).
To be honest, practical art isn't the sort of thing where you can benefit by copying off your mates. I mean, I tried it once and I still failed!
To be honest, practical art isn't the sort of thing where you can benefit by copying off your mates. I mean, I tried it once and I still failed!
It is not unusual for a subject teacher to invigilate a test or examination , held in a specialist room , say cookery , metal work or art.That teacher is familiar with the equipment in that room , and would be able to supply it to a candidate on their request , so that the candidate can continue to carry out the task set in their own way.
this is not unusual ,. Only when the exam forbids the use of extra items would the invigilator not provide them
The fact that people went into the room next door is not really that important in a practical subject.However there should be some supervision to keep noise to a minimum.It is unlikely that the examinees will have suffered in any way really by this intrusion upon their creativity.This would not be the case in say an oral or aural test , nor one where intense concentration was required, mathematics , sciences , languages spring to mind here just as an example.
I would try now to put this test /exam behind you , get some serious revision done for the next ones and the very best of luck.
this is not unusual ,. Only when the exam forbids the use of extra items would the invigilator not provide them
The fact that people went into the room next door is not really that important in a practical subject.However there should be some supervision to keep noise to a minimum.It is unlikely that the examinees will have suffered in any way really by this intrusion upon their creativity.This would not be the case in say an oral or aural test , nor one where intense concentration was required, mathematics , sciences , languages spring to mind here just as an example.
I would try now to put this test /exam behind you , get some serious revision done for the next ones and the very best of luck.
1 - Was this exam a mock exam because I'm highly doubtful it was a GCSE art examination? If so, then I even though the whole aim of them is to get Student's prepared for their real exam conditions, and also the type of questions....It may have been that the teacher felt that by allowing these Student's in question to use a computer, it will benefit them. Also could be a last chance for all coursework to be finalised. Thats just what I think......
-- answer removed --
It was a properly externally assessed gcse exam suposidly under exam conditions and we aren't allowed to go back to any of the work we did for that project.
At one point, the teacher had to make a phone call, so the head invidulator at the school came in to watch us and she didn't let anyone out or on the computer and it was deadly silent, how it should be.
At one point, the teacher had to make a phone call, so the head invidulator at the school came in to watch us and she didn't let anyone out or on the computer and it was deadly silent, how it should be.