Because when you call a black man a n1gger, you're letting down the force, and giving young black men ammunition in their idea that the police are institutionally racist (and I don't believe they are).
The CPS reconsiders case files when upon the request of the plaintiff, if it is felt that not all the facts were originally taken into consideration.
For instance, it's entirely possible that the CPS ruled the recording as inadmissible in a court of law, which would have a detrimental effect on the plaintiff's case.
Sort the responses on the mail link into best rated order.
It so thoroughly depressing that the outrage felt is not I'm support of the arrested man.
...actually...what we need is full disclosure. Why was he arrested? We're charges brought? was he convicted?
This shouldn't have a bearing on the matter, but there are those (particularly when you read the Mail readers feedback) for whom this will be pertinent.