Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Ronnie Barker's Son Porn Charges
23 Answers
He came to the attention of the police because he PAID for some images.
He deserves to be caught for being ...
(a) perverted, and
(b) really stupid.
"Ah, some illegal pictures. I know, I'll use my debit card to buy them." Media URL: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ronnie-barker-son-adam-barker-1349411
Description:
He deserves to be caught for being ...
(a) perverted, and
(b) really stupid.
"Ah, some illegal pictures. I know, I'll use my debit card to buy them." Media URL: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ronnie-barker-son-adam-barker-1349411
Description:
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by joggerjayne. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Interesting to note that I typed in 'Ronnie Barker's Son' into a search engine and out came reports on this from:
The Daily Mail
The Guardian
The Telegraph
The Metro
The Sun
UK News
Digital Spy
Yet try and do the same, and type in 'Oxford Sex Grooming' and one gets nothing earlier than March 2012, yet the hearing only took place at the Old Bailey yesterday.
The Daily Mail
The Guardian
The Telegraph
The Metro
The Sun
UK News
Digital Spy
Yet try and do the same, and type in 'Oxford Sex Grooming' and one gets nothing earlier than March 2012, yet the hearing only took place at the Old Bailey yesterday.
Fluffygrandpa,
The Oxford accused were only charged yesterday, which suggests that the ALLEDGED offenses have only recently come to light. All have denyed all the charges. A trial date has been st for early 2013.
The charges against Adam Barker go back many years and I gather he has been evading justice for a long time. He was tempted back so he could recieve inheritance money. He probably figured a couple of years in clink is worth £2million.
So the two cases are not comparable.
The Oxford accused were only charged yesterday, which suggests that the ALLEDGED offenses have only recently come to light. All have denyed all the charges. A trial date has been st for early 2013.
The charges against Adam Barker go back many years and I gather he has been evading justice for a long time. He was tempted back so he could recieve inheritance money. He probably figured a couple of years in clink is worth £2million.
So the two cases are not comparable.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.