Quizzes & Puzzles10 mins ago
Us Spying On World Leaders
31 Answers
More Snowdon revalations have shown the NSA to have been tapping the phones of 35 World Leaders including France and Germany
This in the middle of negotiations to form the world's largest free-trade area between the US and the EU
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/wo rld-eur ope-246 68286
Is this sufficiently important to justify Snowdon's release of information to you? - if not what would?
How can the US restablish trust with the rest of the world leaders now?
This in the middle of negotiations to form the world's largest free-trade area between the US and the EU
http://
Is this sufficiently important to justify Snowdon's release of information to you? - if not what would?
How can the US restablish trust with the rest of the world leaders now?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by jake-the-peg. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.// I find it bizarre how people are just fine with this. //
It not so much a case of being fine with it, so much as an acceptance that espionage has always and will always be carried out for military/economic purposes, even between so called allies.
All governments know that, and they all do it. There's a period of embarrassment when someone gets caught, because you're not supposed to get caught doing it - it's bad form, but it will continue, irrespective of which ambassadors get summoned to wherever to explain themselves.
It not so much a case of being fine with it, so much as an acceptance that espionage has always and will always be carried out for military/economic purposes, even between so called allies.
All governments know that, and they all do it. There's a period of embarrassment when someone gets caught, because you're not supposed to get caught doing it - it's bad form, but it will continue, irrespective of which ambassadors get summoned to wherever to explain themselves.
Everyone spies on everyone else to the best of their ability. The US probably does more of it as it has the most advanced technology. I doubt if thère's ever been an occasion in history where someone has passed up the chance of significant intelligence for reasons of etiquette.
It's not a question of trust in the future bit just making sure you think you are one step ahead of the other lot :-)
It's not a question of trust in the future bit just making sure you think you are one step ahead of the other lot :-)
"Come to think of it, I wonder how 'man of principle - ed snowden' is getting on in his new home of liberal Russia, a country renowned for its refusal to spy on anyone. "
lol - yes, that aspect of it leaves me feeling most uneasy about any claim Snowden might have to the moral high ground here. If there was some justification or value in his initial "whistleblowing" he has since gone way beyond that. It's hard not to compare him with Kim Philby now.
lol - yes, that aspect of it leaves me feeling most uneasy about any claim Snowden might have to the moral high ground here. If there was some justification or value in his initial "whistleblowing" he has since gone way beyond that. It's hard not to compare him with Kim Philby now.
"Philby defected to the country he was spying for" doesn't sound all that different, effectively, to what Snowden has done. If he wasn't spying for Russia at the start (and there are those who think he might have been) then that's effectively what he's up to now.
But the biggest comparison is the damage done to the UK/US intelligence services and their agents abroad, regardless of anything else.
But the biggest comparison is the damage done to the UK/US intelligence services and their agents abroad, regardless of anything else.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.