News0 min ago
Daily Mail? Daily Pervert!
39 Answers
We all know that you don't have to DO anything to be featured in the Daily Mail. You just have to wear a short skirt, or show some cleavage. Or, the Holy Grail of Daily Mail journalism ... a nipple outline.
The latest victim of the Daily Pervert is Christina Milan, who attracted the attention of the Mail's serious front line journalists by showing a bit of her pants.
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/t vshowbi z/artic le-2546 240/Chr istina- Milian- suffers -wardro be-malf unction -backle ss-dres s-expos es-g-st ring.ht ml
The latest victim of the Daily Pervert is Christina Milan, who attracted the attention of the Mail's serious front line journalists by showing a bit of her pants.
http://
Answers
I can't bear those sites and magazines that point out tiny, slightly less beautiful bits, like a little bit of flab, sweat patch or hairy armpit. Any journalist who writes these articles should publish a full-length, untouched photo of themselves alongside them. I do generally ignore them.
09:44 Mon 27th Jan 2014
Is this news or just another pathetic jab at the Daily Mail?
If you don't like the paper why do you and others go out your way to enter it's website so continuously?
If these so called celebs choose to go out in public dressed in such a tarty way then they are open for criticism.
And as for this disgusting passage there is no place for it on a family web site such as this, and this kind of thing says much more about the poster than anything the Daily Mail could be accused of.
/// I'm tempted to think that most of the male staff at the Daily Pervert spend much of the day furtively touching their own willies. ///
If you don't like the paper why do you and others go out your way to enter it's website so continuously?
If these so called celebs choose to go out in public dressed in such a tarty way then they are open for criticism.
And as for this disgusting passage there is no place for it on a family web site such as this, and this kind of thing says much more about the poster than anything the Daily Mail could be accused of.
/// I'm tempted to think that most of the male staff at the Daily Pervert spend much of the day furtively touching their own willies. ///
And let's not forget the leers over this 15 year old:
http:// www.the mediabl og.co.u k/the-m edia-bl og/2013 /01/the -daily- mail-al l-grown -up.htm l
AOG...you post many links from the Daily Mail, so I expect you would be in a better position than the rest of us to comment.
Why does the paper print such creepy articles?
It's not like other papers do the same.
Are they simply editorial mistakes, or an indication of something genuinely creepy?
http://
AOG...you post many links from the Daily Mail, so I expect you would be in a better position than the rest of us to comment.
Why does the paper print such creepy articles?
It's not like other papers do the same.
Are they simply editorial mistakes, or an indication of something genuinely creepy?
sp1814
/// AOG...you post many links from the Daily Mail, so I expect you would be in a better position than the rest of us to comment. ///
Well apparently not because it was not me who came across this, but someone who hates the Daily Mail but then goes to the trouble of reading their TV & Show Biz web site, a thing that I never do, so perhaps it should be for those much more experienced in such things to comment?
But I will make this comment after reading the link below;
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/t vshowbi z/artic le-2269 261/Lit tle-Len i-steal s-mothe r-Heidi -Klum-w ears-do wdy-out fit-to- gym-cla ss.html
I can see no reference to a 'leggy beauty' in the Daily Mail report, maybe it has been edited out who knows, whereas i wouldn't describe an eight year old in such a way, this is what journalists do, and incidentally it wasn't a man that wrote this but a female.
Below is a readers comment;
/// Mark hawkins, it's people like you that cause the problem, pointing fingers at something quite normal with your hysterical comments. If YOU see these images of an 8 year old in shorts as sexual , then it's YOU that has the problem. ///
/// AOG...you post many links from the Daily Mail, so I expect you would be in a better position than the rest of us to comment. ///
Well apparently not because it was not me who came across this, but someone who hates the Daily Mail but then goes to the trouble of reading their TV & Show Biz web site, a thing that I never do, so perhaps it should be for those much more experienced in such things to comment?
But I will make this comment after reading the link below;
http://
I can see no reference to a 'leggy beauty' in the Daily Mail report, maybe it has been edited out who knows, whereas i wouldn't describe an eight year old in such a way, this is what journalists do, and incidentally it wasn't a man that wrote this but a female.
Below is a readers comment;
/// Mark hawkins, it's people like you that cause the problem, pointing fingers at something quite normal with your hysterical comments. If YOU see these images of an 8 year old in shorts as sexual , then it's YOU that has the problem. ///
joggerjayne
Look what I have come across while trawling the 'NEWS' sections of other newspapers, also reported on by a 'FEMALE'.
http:// www.exp ress.co .uk/new s/showb iz/4561 70/Abbe y-Clanc y-looks -stunni ng-in-s exy-lin gerie-p hoto-sh oot-for -her-Ul timo-de but
I am surprised this as escaped your attention, or is it only the Daily Mail's TV and Show Biz section you are attracted to?
Look what I have come across while trawling the 'NEWS' sections of other newspapers, also reported on by a 'FEMALE'.
http://
I am surprised this as escaped your attention, or is it only the Daily Mail's TV and Show Biz section you are attracted to?
AOG
Yes - the Daily Mail changed the text. However, if you look at this link, and then sort the comments into the top rated order, you can still see the original comments:
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/t vshowbi z/artic le-2269 261/Lit tle-Len i-steal s-mothe r-Heidi -Klum-w ears-do wdy-out fit-to- gym-cla ss.html
Yes - the Daily Mail changed the text. However, if you look at this link, and then sort the comments into the top rated order, you can still see the original comments:
http://
.
I mistook the g-string for a bunty - or that word to describe scrunching uyour underpants and sticking them along the natal left (of the buttocks)
I think she scored 10 / 10 for wearing underpants in public and letting everyone know it....
erm can anyone tell me - has AOG undergone acute sudden loss of his sense of humour or is it that he neva had one ?
I mistook the g-string for a bunty - or that word to describe scrunching uyour underpants and sticking them along the natal left (of the buttocks)
I think she scored 10 / 10 for wearing underpants in public and letting everyone know it....
erm can anyone tell me - has AOG undergone acute sudden loss of his sense of humour or is it that he neva had one ?
Gromit
/// You are taking the wrong tack here AOG. ///
/// The Daily Mail 'Sidebar of shame' is a great British newspaper institution. Up there with Marge Proops, the Old Codgers and
Fred basset. ///
What the hell are you going on about?
We are discussing something that appeared in the TV and Show Biz section here not something in the 'sidebar of shame' whatever that may be'.
/// You are taking the wrong tack here AOG. ///
/// The Daily Mail 'Sidebar of shame' is a great British newspaper institution. Up there with Marge Proops, the Old Codgers and
Fred basset. ///
What the hell are you going on about?
We are discussing something that appeared in the TV and Show Biz section here not something in the 'sidebar of shame' whatever that may be'.