ChatterBank1 min ago
A Culture Of Arrogance
39 Answers
Why is it that when you talk to somebody in the yes campaign for independence they are so arrogant? There seems to be a culture of arrogance in the yes camp has anyone else found that?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by gordiescotland1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.TTT I resent your comment about brainwashed schoolkids having the vote. My grandson has the vote for the first time and believe me he is far from brainwashed. The subject has been debated in school and he watches and listens to all the televised debates. Much to my disgust he is voting NO, but that's what democracy is all about.
Yes people all live and dwell in the past. They don't give a rats about the future of the country. They bang on about "my" future, but never about THE future. Independence is forever not just something that can be voted out after 5 years when the initial euphoria has worn off. Salmond hates Scotland and the Scots and is willing to drag us all back into the past and leave us there to languish. He and his ilk are all on a massive, and very dangerous, ego trip.
I'm in the "Yes" camp (although outrageously, living in England, I don't get a vote on the future of my nation).
"Devolution that came about as a result of Labour winning the landslide victory in 1997 I might remind everybody"
Yes quite true, Mikey. And one of the most ridiculous measures to come from a government in recent years, even by that administration's abysmal standards.
The South East (with a population far greater than that of Scotland and Wales combined) has often been governed by a party that most of the electorate there have no intention ever of voting for. It's called democracy - you don't always get what you want. Scotland or Wales have no more right to independence - or for that matter devolution - than the South East, or Cornwall or Liverpool has. When this nonsensical referendum is done and dusted and the Nos have it as I'm sure they will, the UK government should set about homogenising the minor nations in to the rest of the UK. That includes their financial systems, their judicial systems and everything else that is the responsibility of the UK government in England. Either that or break up the whole kit and caboodle into four bits and let each of them get on with it.
I hope I'm not too arrogant because actually I don't give a monkey's how the vote goes. If it results in Scottish independence that's fine so long as it is achieved quickly and does not compromise the UK's currency by involving a Sterling currency union with an independent nation that has not a hope in hell of paying its way. If it results in a "No" vote that too is no big deal, but any more devolutionary measures (the so-called "dev-max" solution) would be a grave mistake.
"Devolution that came about as a result of Labour winning the landslide victory in 1997 I might remind everybody"
Yes quite true, Mikey. And one of the most ridiculous measures to come from a government in recent years, even by that administration's abysmal standards.
The South East (with a population far greater than that of Scotland and Wales combined) has often been governed by a party that most of the electorate there have no intention ever of voting for. It's called democracy - you don't always get what you want. Scotland or Wales have no more right to independence - or for that matter devolution - than the South East, or Cornwall or Liverpool has. When this nonsensical referendum is done and dusted and the Nos have it as I'm sure they will, the UK government should set about homogenising the minor nations in to the rest of the UK. That includes their financial systems, their judicial systems and everything else that is the responsibility of the UK government in England. Either that or break up the whole kit and caboodle into four bits and let each of them get on with it.
I hope I'm not too arrogant because actually I don't give a monkey's how the vote goes. If it results in Scottish independence that's fine so long as it is achieved quickly and does not compromise the UK's currency by involving a Sterling currency union with an independent nation that has not a hope in hell of paying its way. If it results in a "No" vote that too is no big deal, but any more devolutionary measures (the so-called "dev-max" solution) would be a grave mistake.
You're not alone, jomifl.
More than 57m people live in the remainder of the UK and they don't matter either. Even though Mr Salmond's plan is to demand a currency union with the rest of the UK or else walk away from the Union without accepting responsibility for the Scots' share of the National Debt.
More than 57m people live in the remainder of the UK and they don't matter either. Even though Mr Salmond's plan is to demand a currency union with the rest of the UK or else walk away from the Union without accepting responsibility for the Scots' share of the National Debt.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.