Body & Soul1 min ago
Secret Weapon Testing?volcano? Or Something Else?
59 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Henrietta. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Mikey, too combative perhaps since your first post was removed. Anyway, Henrietta will have her own thoughts on your debating style.
It is inevitable in most questions that differing views are expressed. If you consider that you can't enter a 'rational' debate as you put it why do you insist on participating in them?
It is inevitable in most questions that differing views are expressed. If you consider that you can't enter a 'rational' debate as you put it why do you insist on participating in them?
-- answer removed --
Mikey, if people want to discuss aliens they are at liberty to do so without being ridiculed. In one breath you apologise for insulting the OP and in the next you continue to disparage her. So much for the apology. If you want to join a discussion, join it, but don’t treat everyone who disagrees with you as though they’re idiots. They’re not. Threads here shouldn’t be constantly disrupted or disparaged by what appears to be a newly-formed in-house ‘rent-a-mob’. You say “We are all adults here”, but looking at some of these responses. I have my doubts.
Incidentally, you wouldn’t know what typical Von Daniken material is. By your own admission you’ve never read it, so let’s stop the pretence right here.
Incidentally, you wouldn’t know what typical Von Daniken material is. By your own admission you’ve never read it, so let’s stop the pretence right here.
I meant that you might have taken them off in order to untwist them !
What I can't understand this is that you readily tear into theists, like JW's but you seem to think that spouting nonsense about Moon Bases, etc is OK ?
You have me on your side when it comes to religion, but I am not sure why you have been taken in by Von Daniken ? I take it you don't agree with Carl Sagan then ? Most people recognise that VD is a charlatan. And I did read "Chariots of the Gods" when I was a teenager, on a beach in Greece and it was obvious even then that he was either a confidence trickster, or seriously deranged. I am still undecided but am edging towards the con man, as most people I associate with see him.
What I can't understand this is that you readily tear into theists, like JW's but you seem to think that spouting nonsense about Moon Bases, etc is OK ?
You have me on your side when it comes to religion, but I am not sure why you have been taken in by Von Daniken ? I take it you don't agree with Carl Sagan then ? Most people recognise that VD is a charlatan. And I did read "Chariots of the Gods" when I was a teenager, on a beach in Greece and it was obvious even then that he was either a confidence trickster, or seriously deranged. I am still undecided but am edging towards the con man, as most people I associate with see him.
Mikey, I’m not interested in what you meant. You are rude in the extreme. That said, firstly, I don’t take ‘sides’ – I have no desire to sycophantically curry favour with anyone - and secondly, I don’t “tear into theists” – I criticise their philosophy with constructive argument. As for Von Daniken, I said several times on the other thread that I really don’t care what he is or was, or what anyone’s perceptions of him are – I am interested only in his fundamental hypothesis – but you’re clearly still not listening.
No Jom, that would be the people who have taken just recently to disrupting Henrietta’s threads – this the second in a couple of days.
No Jom, that would be the people who have taken just recently to disrupting Henrietta’s threads – this the second in a couple of days.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.