the girl only reported that she believed her drink had been spiked, which was proved to be untrue. this took place at about 4 am, by 11.30 am no alcohol was found in her bloodstream. it was the police took the case to the cps for rape, both of the two footballers concerned being charged. they admitted to having sex with the girl but she was a willing participant at the time. the jury took the view that she was capable of consent when she was with the first footballer, but for some reason was not capable when with ched evans. an expert witness called for the appeal was not allowed to be admitted into evidence. he maintained that just because you don't remember it the day after, does not necessarily mean that you were incapable of consent several hours earlier. however, jury found him guilty, end of. served his sentence but still believes himself to be innocent. who knows. juries don't always get it right, remember timothy evans, hanged then subsequently found to be innocent. irrelevant now anyway - question is about should he be allowed to play football on the basis he is a role model. do me a favour, footballers are not, and have no responsibility to be role models, that is the responsibility of parents. footballers are merely (highly paid) entertainers and there is no reason why they should be expected to occupy some kind of moral high ground superior to the rest of us. does anyone (old enough), ever remember elvis Presley, or the rolling stones being held up as some kind of role model. don't think so. let him return, although not to Sheffield, and take the flak he will certainly get from the crowd. and I do wish men would stop telling female victims of rape how they feel, how traumatised they are and how their lives are ruined. the only person who has the right to say that is the person who the rape was perpetrated on.