Clanad..thanks for complimenting me and then dissing me in the same sentence. Its a difficult thing to achieve but you seemed to have managed it today.
I thought that I had explained already, but perhaps I haven't after all. I don't like or dislike Palin. Whether I like her or not is entirely immaterial.
I am merely questioning her ability to make it to the top in politics, as she doesn't appear to have sufficient intellectual capability for the task. She is lacking in credibility, and that is where the Republican Party is at fault.
As to Track, an inane* name like that might very well go down well in Alaska but on our side of the pond its just silly. My analogies of other similar geographical features is entirely valid. If you think that "Track" is a suitable name for a child, then it must follow that you also approve of fence, road, field and hedge, as they they are just as valid or invalid. They just sound daft, a word that I realise is not very well used in America, so perhaps I should use "dumb" instead. Its about as sensible as Frank Zappa calling his daughter Moon Unit...its just stupid ! But I guess as Americans come over as rather more credulous than us Brits, the perception of what is stupid may not mean the same on your side of the Pond
Until the Republican Party gets to be more choosy about who represents them, they will find it difficult to win. Comedy should be left for comedians, not serious politicians. People were laughing at Mitt, Palin and co, not with them.
To us Brits, the Republican party conjures up an image where the main elements are...fondness for guns, questionable religions, downright loopiness and arrested education.
* Inane...silly, foolish, stupid, fatuous, idiotic, absurd, ridiculous, etc.