ChatterBank0 min ago
More Votes For Our Nige?
37 Answers
http://
Do we actually have to wait until our infrastructure collapses before the EU let us do anything, would they even then?
Thanks you Brown, Blair and Cameron for this wonderful mess we are in. I doubt you lot will have to live in the mess we will end up in.
Do we actually have to wait until our infrastructure collapses before the EU let us do anything, would they even then?
Thanks you Brown, Blair and Cameron for this wonderful mess we are in. I doubt you lot will have to live in the mess we will end up in.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
So far I'm not convinced that UKIP are really winning based on their policies, since some of these seem to be changing daily. Still, as long as it's actually that rather than a massive "up yours" to the two main parties then that would be OK. Mind, when it comes to a General Election that's usually what happens anyway. The public as a whole are far too sensible to let a party in solely based on its being "not the current lot".
Well the current fuss is becasue he failed to achieve what he said.
As for 'net' benefits it depends what you mean by that. If you live in an area where the infrastructure is at breaking point, A&E, schools, plod etc etc I dont think you would see a net benefit. If you dont or are employing cheap labour at the expense of British workers then yes I am sure you will see a net benefit.
The problem is not immigration per se, it is about unctontrolled immigration. Controlled immigration is a good thing, you can match the countries requirements and balance the infrastructure to cope and spo benefit the current inhabitants and the new immigrants. Everyone is happy.
But in the EU you cannot do that. And that is the problem.
Of course the other problem is the failed multi cultural experiment of New labour that labourites seem to think could be sorted out, by someone else, in 5 years. People not integrating, refusing to use the language and creating communities that actually exclude others living in the country is very wrong and causes tension. This can and should be tackled hard.
As for 'net' benefits it depends what you mean by that. If you live in an area where the infrastructure is at breaking point, A&E, schools, plod etc etc I dont think you would see a net benefit. If you dont or are employing cheap labour at the expense of British workers then yes I am sure you will see a net benefit.
The problem is not immigration per se, it is about unctontrolled immigration. Controlled immigration is a good thing, you can match the countries requirements and balance the infrastructure to cope and spo benefit the current inhabitants and the new immigrants. Everyone is happy.
But in the EU you cannot do that. And that is the problem.
Of course the other problem is the failed multi cultural experiment of New labour that labourites seem to think could be sorted out, by someone else, in 5 years. People not integrating, refusing to use the language and creating communities that actually exclude others living in the country is very wrong and causes tension. This can and should be tackled hard.
A recent fact from the media was the one showing the net benefits of immigration in fact.
UKIP have always scaremongered, playing on especially older people's fear of change and let's be honest suspicion of foreigners The fact that they are currently running at their likely max rating of 25% doesn't alter that. What has changed is the unseemly panic by their opponents.
UKIP have always scaremongered, playing on especially older people's fear of change and let's be honest suspicion of foreigners The fact that they are currently running at their likely max rating of 25% doesn't alter that. What has changed is the unseemly panic by their opponents.
Strangely though, I don't seem to be seeing 'the net benefits of migration'.
I see a crumbling NHS and primary school classes doubling in size.
If net migration is boosting our economy, why isn't the money being channelled into the two areas of concern I mentioned?
Oh I forgot, we're giving it back to the EU in fines because our economy is growing too fast!!
I see a crumbling NHS and primary school classes doubling in size.
If net migration is boosting our economy, why isn't the money being channelled into the two areas of concern I mentioned?
Oh I forgot, we're giving it back to the EU in fines because our economy is growing too fast!!
And this is the kind of people that are walking in!!!!!!!
What the hell is this Country coming too?????
http://
What the hell is this Country coming too?????
http://
Indeed trt:
http://
Like I say, UKIP don't need to spend millions on campaigning, the media are doing it all for them and the electorate are waking up to it, as it doesn't appear to be being addressed.
http://
Like I say, UKIP don't need to spend millions on campaigning, the media are doing it all for them and the electorate are waking up to it, as it doesn't appear to be being addressed.
http://
It does sometimes appear that we are allowing in a lot of people with a propensity for violence.
It does sometimes appear that we are allowing in a lot of people with a propensity for violence.
Latest Posts
Film, Media & TV1 min ago
News2 mins ago
ChatterBank4 mins ago
Assisted Dying, Here's Where It...
News4 mins ago
Jobs & Education5 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.