Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 9 of 9rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by tonyav. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Tony....couldn't get this to play for me.....maybe I'm too short....☺
I prefer the term "small". I may be 5'3" but I'm not short of anything.

:-D
(One of the best advantages of being small is that leg room on airplanes really isn't an issue.)
I'm only 5'2" and I hate it. I'd love to be taller. I don't mean Miranda Hart tall, just maybe 5'4" or 5'5".
janbee: Imagine what Miranda Hart would look like if she was shorter though, her bazookas would just look ridiculous!
diz, ... and they don't already?
My dads sisters (5) are all under 5ft. Big bums and massive boobs. Luckily I take after my mum :-)
janbee: I certainly wouldn't say no to Miranda Hart ;) put her alongside Sarah Millican and I'd have a headache within seconds.
Yes, being 'short' (5'4 and a half inches) means slight advantage in leg room on planes.
It also means staring into sweaty men's armpits on crowded tube trains going to the football.
It did mean I got to ask a variety of taller men to get things off shelves for me when shopping on Monday (who were all very nice and helpful).

1 to 9 of 9rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Short !.

Answer Question >>