An entrepeneur makes wifi gloves as iglove. Most dragons say Apple hold the patent for use of i . An iron was named before Apple got in. Also, Apple was a trade name for Beatles fashions in the 60s.
I cannot see how a company can copyright a prefix letter but, ok, there may be problems using the i prefix as in iGlove, iKazi whatever, not sure but the glove was a good idea and I was surprised they didn't just say it needed a new name, let's call it the TGlove for example. Sorted.
The issue is, if you heard that a product called an iGlove worked with an iPhone, iPad or iPod, and you knew that those devices were made by Apple, could you reasonably assume that the iGlove was also made by Apple? I think you might. This would be why Apple would fight against the glove being named that.
I cannot see how a company can copyright a prefix letter but, ok, there may be problems using the i prefix as in iGlove, iKazi whatever, not sure but the glove was a good idea and I was surprised they didn't just say it needed a new name, let's call it the TGlove for example. Sorted.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.