ChatterBank2 mins ago
For Consideration
14 Answers
(a) This money could be tool (4)
(b) This money when processed could be tool (4)
(c) This money when withdrawn could be tool (4)
(b) This money when processed could be tool (4)
(c) This money when withdrawn could be tool (4)
Answers
Well admittedly they are all poor, but for different reasons.
In any cryptic clue the definition could be the wordplay, or vice versa, by some means. It's the setter's job to tell us how, albeit in a cryptic manner.
(a) completely fails to tell the solver How LOOT could be TOOL,
(b) includes an anagram indicator
and more helpfully (c) includes a reversal indicator
In any cryptic clue the definition could be the wordplay, or vice versa, by some means. It's the setter's job to tell us how, albeit in a cryptic manner.
(a) completely fails to tell the solver How LOOT could be TOOL,
(b) includes an anagram indicator
and more helpfully (c) includes a reversal indicator
You certainly aren't alone there, don't worry, it's just that they don't really tick the box for indicating a rearrangement of the letters, that's all. They do appear in lists of 'acceptable' anagram indicators both online and in print, even Chambers Crossword Guide, but more experienced setters tend to avoid them. Here is a lovely example of the correct use of 'could be' in conjunction with an anagram indicator, in a prize winning &lit Azed Competition clue:
Ham, a slice of Granary, plus a couple of onions (pickled)? Could be ——’s (9)
Ham, a slice of Granary, plus a couple of onions (pickled)? Could be ——’s (9)