ChatterBank1 min ago
Would You Like To See The Answerbank Redesign?
143 Answers
Hello!
As you know, we're working on redesigning the site so that it works on every device - i.e. it works on mobile, tablet and your laptop/desktop PC.
We're also taking the opportunity to tidy up some stuff, like reducing the number of categories, swapping the sizes of adverts to more commonly used sizes (this should mean the ads get better).
To make sure everyone feels as consulted as possible, I'd like to show you where the designs are currently settled. If you have any good ideas for the layout, design, colours, fonts etc, please provide your feedback here.
What I would really like to know is, do you understand it, just by looking at it?
I'll post different versions of the homepage first, with a small description. You should be able to click the images to make them pop open in a new browser tab.
The thread will be closed while I sort out these images as answers, and will reopen shortly afterwards.
Homepage: Desktop // Tablet // Mobile
Homepage & Menu: Desktop // Tablet // Mobile
Question Pages: Desktop // Tablet // Mobile
OTHER NEW DESKTOP PAGES:
New Desktop Search
New My Profile
New Category Page
New Article Page
As you know, we're working on redesigning the site so that it works on every device - i.e. it works on mobile, tablet and your laptop/desktop PC.
We're also taking the opportunity to tidy up some stuff, like reducing the number of categories, swapping the sizes of adverts to more commonly used sizes (this should mean the ads get better).
To make sure everyone feels as consulted as possible, I'd like to show you where the designs are currently settled. If you have any good ideas for the layout, design, colours, fonts etc, please provide your feedback here.
What I would really like to know is, do you understand it, just by looking at it?
I'll post different versions of the homepage first, with a small description. You should be able to click the images to make them pop open in a new browser tab.
The thread will be closed while I sort out these images as answers, and will reopen shortly afterwards.
Homepage: Desktop // Tablet // Mobile
Homepage & Menu: Desktop // Tablet // Mobile
Question Pages: Desktop // Tablet // Mobile
OTHER NEW DESKTOP PAGES:
New Desktop Search
New My Profile
New Category Page
New Article Page
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by AB Editor. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The aim is to maximise the use of the space, without cluttering it.
At the Moment, if you scroll to the bottom of the page you will see two empty columns of white with the answer in between. If there are long answers, you have to scroll down a lot.
By doing away with the left column, the answer width can be longer, so the height will be shorter, resulting in less scrolling, and the whole answer more likely to be displayed in full on the screen in the first place.
At the Moment, if you scroll to the bottom of the page you will see two empty columns of white with the answer in between. If there are long answers, you have to scroll down a lot.
By doing away with the left column, the answer width can be longer, so the height will be shorter, resulting in less scrolling, and the whole answer more likely to be displayed in full on the screen in the first place.
Fonts:
Garamond is a very bad idea. To make the font look bigger, you need a font with a high x height, and Garamond doesn't. It was designed for metal and paper, you should choose a font designed to screens.
In terms of legibility you are better with a Sans Serif font. As mention previous
Verdana is the best of the default fonts, that everyone has.
Your site font (looks a bit like Antique Olive to me) is good in that it has an high x height, but some of the charaters are suspect. You need to pick a font with an open lower case g. One that resembles a 9 rather than an 8 if you get me. Ru99er nor Ru88er. Also where their a different looking characters for Cap I, lowercase l and the number 1.
Garamond is a very bad idea. To make the font look bigger, you need a font with a high x height, and Garamond doesn't. It was designed for metal and paper, you should choose a font designed to screens.
In terms of legibility you are better with a Sans Serif font. As mention previous
Verdana is the best of the default fonts, that everyone has.
Your site font (looks a bit like Antique Olive to me) is good in that it has an high x height, but some of the charaters are suspect. You need to pick a font with an open lower case g. One that resembles a 9 rather than an 8 if you get me. Ru99er nor Ru88er. Also where their a different looking characters for Cap I, lowercase l and the number 1.
// It looks as though it is all becoming far more complicated that at present. //
It terms of functionality and ease of use, it will be the same. The only difference is the categories box will be expandable and collapsable because it is not needed all the time.
// Why not leave well alone? //
At the moment, the owners have to build, operate and maintain two sites, a desktop and a mobile. They also should have a tablet version as well, but don't have that at present. This site was built years ago when most people used desktops. Now, most people use mobile, and the site is clunky.
The redesign is built in something called 'Responsive design'. Instead of having to build 3 sites, they can build one, which adapts the site to display differently depending on the screen size. This will save them money, and give a more consistant experience for all users.
It terms of functionality and ease of use, it will be the same. The only difference is the categories box will be expandable and collapsable because it is not needed all the time.
// Why not leave well alone? //
At the moment, the owners have to build, operate and maintain two sites, a desktop and a mobile. They also should have a tablet version as well, but don't have that at present. This site was built years ago when most people used desktops. Now, most people use mobile, and the site is clunky.
The redesign is built in something called 'Responsive design'. Instead of having to build 3 sites, they can build one, which adapts the site to display differently depending on the screen size. This will save them money, and give a more consistant experience for all users.