News1 min ago
It's Only Fair, Isn't It?
119 Answers
Mrs A (70s, congestive heart failure, weak) has developed lumps in her side and abdomen.
Ok, says GP, we'll send you for an ultrasound scan. We get letter from local (private) clinic. She phones up, they say "Oh, next appointment is November 13th."
Next day she phones again and says she's a private self-funding patient, and asks when the next appointment is. "Tomorrow." Which is only fair, isn't it? People who've worked hard for their money should be able to get proper service.
My Jim Royle.
(And yes, before the intellectual skinheads roar their disapproval, we're going private. We don't spend it on booze/meat/gambling/holidays/cars/etc, so we'll buy her some time instead).
A
Ok, says GP, we'll send you for an ultrasound scan. We get letter from local (private) clinic. She phones up, they say "Oh, next appointment is November 13th."
Next day she phones again and says she's a private self-funding patient, and asks when the next appointment is. "Tomorrow." Which is only fair, isn't it? People who've worked hard for their money should be able to get proper service.
My Jim Royle.
(And yes, before the intellectual skinheads roar their disapproval, we're going private. We don't spend it on booze/meat/gambling/holidays/cars/etc, so we'll buy her some time instead).
A
Answers
Isn’t it jo. I wish Allan would just stop posting ( for his sake )
13:44 Sat 03rd Oct 2020
allenlondon - // Well, I suppose that any fair-minded person would see the absolute inequity of a system that relegates a hard-working tax-paying citizen with potential life-threatening conditions to wait in a long queue while anyone with a full wallet can get treated immediately.
Succinct enough for you? //
As succinct as it is obvious.
My son in law had a rapidly expanding hernia. The NHS gave him an average waiting time of two years - obviously sooner if it strangulated first.
He has the financial resources to pay a four figure sum and have it operated on less than two weeks after diagnosis.
That is as obvious as night following day - which is why I didn't post about on here, and then pre-empt anyone disapproving of his action.
As I said, I don;t know what point you are making, or what reaction you hope to get?
Do you want a pat on the back for not burdening the NHS because you are in the fortunate position of being able not to because you have not spent your money elsewhere?
OK fine - well done you.
Happy now?
Succinct enough for you? //
As succinct as it is obvious.
My son in law had a rapidly expanding hernia. The NHS gave him an average waiting time of two years - obviously sooner if it strangulated first.
He has the financial resources to pay a four figure sum and have it operated on less than two weeks after diagnosis.
That is as obvious as night following day - which is why I didn't post about on here, and then pre-empt anyone disapproving of his action.
As I said, I don;t know what point you are making, or what reaction you hope to get?
Do you want a pat on the back for not burdening the NHS because you are in the fortunate position of being able not to because you have not spent your money elsewhere?
OK fine - well done you.
Happy now?
Woofgang, //Banning private medicine won’t put any more resource into the NHS.//
Quite right. People who complain about private medicine tend to forget that those who pay for their care privately also pay National Insurance contributions - and take little of it back. It could also be argued, quite justifiably, that private care shortens NHS waiting lists.
Quite right. People who complain about private medicine tend to forget that those who pay for their care privately also pay National Insurance contributions - and take little of it back. It could also be argued, quite justifiably, that private care shortens NHS waiting lists.
-- answer removed --