Hi anyone (esp squad) able to help with positive scenario
My dad : 72yr
Below is text from my mum.
PSA 14
Prostate swollen, hard lump which makes urologist think tumour. MRI will give further detail. Also did ultrasound. If MRI indicates tumour next will be a biopsy. He is not emptying bladder fully. After sample for dr there was still 250ml in bladder. Of course, he doesn't want to drink much and I worry about flushing kidneys and dehydration but can understand.
The mri will show grading and type of cancer. If aggressive will need prostate removal if slow then medication
As they left urologist he said “sorry to give you probable bad news”
(My own concerns are - if it’s aggressive is it curable ? Symptoms do seem to have come on quite fast.
Also at 72 my dad still works full time (he lives in South Africa there is no nhs and he must work as cannot afford not to) and if there is a prostatectomy I think he will surely be unable to work for a while! And wld they prob do chemo I wonder?
Sqad's input will obviously be far more valuable than mine but, as I've got prostate cancer myself (and have therefore boned up a bit on the subject), I'll throw in my tuppence worth anyway. Firstly, a bit about PSA levels: In a man under 50, a 'normal' PSA level is under 5 but for those who're are older, it might get up to around 8 without causing any real concern....
In simple terms, the cancer has spread from the prostate gland into the surrounding tissues including the urethra but worse still into the pelvic lymph glands.
Stage 4 and not good news I'm afraid.
Sorry.
Ty sqad - and yes to my layman’s eyes I can’t see the point of removing prostate of its spread beyond? But of course if it needs to alleviate pain / symptoms.
I’m looking on uk Macmillan site (
want to avoid the total Google thing as misinformation can be spread from random posts.
The spread of my own prostate cancer puts it into 'Stage 4' but, the better part of two years after diagnosis, I'm still here and determined to continue to be an annoyance on AB for quite some time yet ;-)
Obv he hasn’t got those results back but his surgeon did see him before he was discharged.
The surgeon said:
even without the lab results today has confirmed its “substantial “ (not a word that goes well with cancer!)
Doc further said that :
A PET scan will be done prob in next 2 weeks.
There will be surgery of some sort. (He referred to a “big cut to come” so that means open rather than laparoscopic I guess.
That it’s unlikely that doc will recommend radiation (that surprised me but I wonder if perhaps my dad misunderstood or if I missed something when my dad relayed it to me).
That my dad is fitter than average for 72 and that counts in his favour as gives more options
I keep holding onto the fact buenchico is doing well.
Any idea as to why the PET wld be suggested? Obv again I realise no one can dx on here with the limited info I gave but just keen for input
A PET scan looks for signs of involvement in all areas of the body and I think it helps identify lesions. Following a CAT scan I had a PET as the CAT showed a "lesion" in the long. The PET scan determined it was nothing.
Clearly extensive surgery has been decided upon.
However if the cancer has spread to lungs ,liver or bone, then surgery is out of the question.
A PET scan will answer that question.