ChatterBank0 min ago
Why Did We Shoot Spies?
Why did we execute spies? What harm could they do once we’d locked them up? Why didn’t we treat them like other POWs?
Was it just habit?
Was it just habit?
Answers
More research needed methinks.
///Yes, but one reason why POWs were treated well by both Allied and Nazi captors was so that the OTHER side would have some obligation to do the same. //
This tells a different narrative
https:/ /ww2air craft.n et/foru m/threa ds/raf- bomber- command -confir med-war -crime- actions -1939-1 945.229 72/
///Yes, but one reason why POWs were treated well by both Allied and Nazi captors was so that the OTHER side would have some obligation to do the same. //
This tells a different narrative
https:/
Yes, of course, retrocop (“More research needed methinks”) - I’m not saying that the Germans behaved with honour and decency, just that SOME elements of the heirarchy did, or at least weren’t all tub-thumping lunatics. The prisoner exchange was one manifestation of this - and of course self-preservation came into it - they wanted clean(-ish) hands when the inevitable defeat came.
But anyway, the original question remains. Why bother killing spies when they’re already locked away?
But anyway, the original question remains. Why bother killing spies when they’re already locked away?
//Otherwise I'll just conclude that there is NO valid reason for executing spies.//
I rather suspect that those who had the carp bombed out of them in the blitz were not interested or expected a reason for the execution.
The spy probably directed the Luftwaffe withinformation on target rich environments.
Unless the spy could be turned and serve a useful purpose to counter intelligence he became another mouth to feed in war torn rationed Geat Britain. So he got the chop.
Movements of shipping to and from Docks were a gift to the Kriegsmarine and a severe loss to logistics and food supply.
I rather suspect that those who had the carp bombed out of them in the blitz were not interested or expected a reason for the execution.
The spy probably directed the Luftwaffe withinformation on target rich environments.
Unless the spy could be turned and serve a useful purpose to counter intelligence he became another mouth to feed in war torn rationed Geat Britain. So he got the chop.
Movements of shipping to and from Docks were a gift to the Kriegsmarine and a severe loss to logistics and food supply.
Yes retro, but we'd got the ***, we'd got them bang to rights, locked up in a small cell. No more information was coming out of them. And I still wonder why we didn't treat them as we treated POWs - for similar reasons, i.e. if you kill OUR spies, we'll kill YOURS, and vice versa. Just lock them up, have 'em back later.
I suspect other answerers have touched on the thinking. Spying is not 'gentlemanly' and they are thus beyond the pale. (Well, it's not gentlemanly when the OTHER side is doing it...)
And my question is slightly broader - why (oh why) did the Yanks kill the Rosenbergs? Is it just that they're even twitchier about spies than us?
B B
I suspect other answerers have touched on the thinking. Spying is not 'gentlemanly' and they are thus beyond the pale. (Well, it's not gentlemanly when the OTHER side is doing it...)
And my question is slightly broader - why (oh why) did the Yanks kill the Rosenbergs? Is it just that they're even twitchier about spies than us?
B B
//why (oh why) did the Yanks kill the Rosenbergs?//
I don't know. they were tried under the Espionage Act of 1917 which, when enacted, provided for 20 years inside. It may have had something to do with Roy Cohn being the prosecutor, he went on to play a leading role in the McCarthy un-American purges. Or it could be the effect the ring was said to have had on the Korean War.
what is true is that the activities of Theodore Hall were far more damaging than the Rosenbergs. Co-incidentally, one of Hall's couriers was Lona Cohen, better known as Helen Kroger, jailed with her husband in 1961 in the UK and later exchanged for UK spy Gerald Brooke. The Krogers lived in Ruislip and when a teenager, I delivered newspapers to their bungalow in Cranley Drive.....
I don't know. they were tried under the Espionage Act of 1917 which, when enacted, provided for 20 years inside. It may have had something to do with Roy Cohn being the prosecutor, he went on to play a leading role in the McCarthy un-American purges. Or it could be the effect the ring was said to have had on the Korean War.
what is true is that the activities of Theodore Hall were far more damaging than the Rosenbergs. Co-incidentally, one of Hall's couriers was Lona Cohen, better known as Helen Kroger, jailed with her husband in 1961 in the UK and later exchanged for UK spy Gerald Brooke. The Krogers lived in Ruislip and when a teenager, I delivered newspapers to their bungalow in Cranley Drive.....