Quizzes & Puzzles20 mins ago
Saving On The Leccy
87 Answers
I drink a lot of coffee. Would it be cheaper to boil just the amount I need each time, or boil a kettle full and store the surplus in a flask?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by barry1010. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I've just investigated your question experimentally:
I put one 'large mug' of water into my kettle and measured the time it took to boil. (My 'large mug' was actually 1½ regular mugs of water. I couldn't use a single regular mug, as the kettle's element wouldn't have been fully covered). That time turned out to be 70 seconds. Therefore boiling three large mugs of water individually would take a total of 210 seconds.
Then I put three large mugs (i.e. 4½ regular mugs) of water into the kettle and checked how long it took to boil. The result? 210 seconds!
i.e. it appears to make NO DIFFERENCE AT ALL to the total boiling time (and therefore to the total amount of electricity used) as to whether you boil the water for your coffee a mug-full at a time or a kettle-full at a time. It will still cost you exactly the same.
I put one 'large mug' of water into my kettle and measured the time it took to boil. (My 'large mug' was actually 1½ regular mugs of water. I couldn't use a single regular mug, as the kettle's element wouldn't have been fully covered). That time turned out to be 70 seconds. Therefore boiling three large mugs of water individually would take a total of 210 seconds.
Then I put three large mugs (i.e. 4½ regular mugs) of water into the kettle and checked how long it took to boil. The result? 210 seconds!
i.e. it appears to make NO DIFFERENCE AT ALL to the total boiling time (and therefore to the total amount of electricity used) as to whether you boil the water for your coffee a mug-full at a time or a kettle-full at a time. It will still cost you exactly the same.