ChatterBank20 mins ago
Loss of earnings in car insurance claim
Hi there, I was involved in a car accident 18 months ago and the insurance have only just paid out for the vehicle. For reasons I won't bore you with now.
My question is, since the accident I have been unable to claim a car allowance as my vehicle was undriveable. Therefore I have had to take a company car. Resulting in me losing approx �500 per month car allowance plus tax rebates etc.
The Forensic accountant has come back saying that they think I am better off with the company car, but I completely disagree. Can anyone give me some advice on how to prove this???
Thanks
My question is, since the accident I have been unable to claim a car allowance as my vehicle was undriveable. Therefore I have had to take a company car. Resulting in me losing approx �500 per month car allowance plus tax rebates etc.
The Forensic accountant has come back saying that they think I am better off with the company car, but I completely disagree. Can anyone give me some advice on how to prove this???
Thanks
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Red1981. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I'm not sure that from an insurance perspective that this could be technically classed as loss of earnings - that is purely loss of wages.
Equally, there is no loss of use case as you had an alternative vehicle.
I would suggest that you speak to a company such as Albany Assitance, or DAS (any of the more reputable accident management companies, and not the ambulance chasers). They will put you on the correct route - I cannot honestly say I have ever seen this as a claim before.
Possibly someone else out there working in the industry will be able to help you out more.
Equally, there is no loss of use case as you had an alternative vehicle.
I would suggest that you speak to a company such as Albany Assitance, or DAS (any of the more reputable accident management companies, and not the ambulance chasers). They will put you on the correct route - I cannot honestly say I have ever seen this as a claim before.
Possibly someone else out there working in the industry will be able to help you out more.
This is a difficult question, but a court would probably agree that the financial benefit of having a company car is probably about equal to the car allowance - otherwise everyone who had the choice would choose one rather than the other. Car allowance might be worth less if you do very high mileage as this would cost a lot in depreciation, or worth more if your mileage is very low, but it's really just a question of balancing the net benefit of a company car (no depreciation, loan interest, insurance charges etc but you have to pay tax) against the value (after tax) of the allowance.