// .bit too clever for sqaddy boy //
well it shouldnt be - it was the basis for the acquittal of Dr bodkin adams - 1957
and makes perfect sense
you are giving morphine to deal with pain
and the shortening of life is an unwanted second effect
' the law on this is very clear. It starts off with the famous direction to the jury by Devlin J in Bodkin Adams and it has been taken up in a number of subsequent authorities: that, if the primary purpose, as here, is to treat properly and to reduce pain, the incidental consequence of shortening of life is perfectly acceptable, medically, ethically and legally." '
Devlin 50 y later then said he thought Bodkin Adams had done it - but so what - a judge can be wrong and frrequently are !