Why on earth do the news programmes insist on broadcasting live from their encampments outside the Houses of Parliament, when we can't hear what is being said because it's drowned out by the shouting and bell-ringing of the flag-wearing morons? I just turn it off - I can't be the only one.
visual variation. If everyone reports from the same studio it gets boring. I don't think they can generally broadcast from within parliament itself so over the road is the best they can do.
Goodgoalie and Gingejbee
Couldn't agree more, well said. Why on earth do we need someone outside 10 Downing Street at 10 o;clock at night ?? Madness.
FBG40
Yes, fbg. Private Eye used to have a column called (I think) Going Live, which instanced reporters reporting live from somewhere absolutely nothing was happening
even radio reporters have to get out of the house and interview people sometimes - the interview itself may not be broadcast, but the reporter will generally have to file a report asap, and equipment these days is good enough to do it as an outside broadcast.
Swearing adds local colour, though radio people do try to minimise noises off.
Because that is where our parliament is and the people of both sides of the debate are having their say .None of this is pretty so at least it’s giving an idea of the real problem we as a country are facing .When the taxi drivers start arriving listen for the cheers of delight .
Don't worry - any day now they'll have some poor sap standing outside in the snow telling you it's snowing, now that is something to really shout at your telly about!!!
Just daft as a reporter standing outside some car dealership at night to tell us about financial problems in the motor industry.
Or reporting from outside the gates of Wimbledon (when it's not even on) about a tennis player who's tested positive for drugs.