Question Author
//did lack the atmosphere and something which I cannot put my finger on.//
Trying to add a modern slant to classics - perhaps in an attempt to pander to the tastes of ‘today’s audiences’ often results in destroying that elusive element of pure genius - the reason books become classics in the first place. I remember being utterly disappointed when television produced a version of Dr Zhivago that contained quite graphic scenes of passion - something that neither the beautifully written book nor the excellent film with Omar Sharif and Julie Christie needed to rely upon.
In the case of ‘Rebecca’, Mrs de Winter was a young girl, dowdy, plain, timid, very unsure of herself and someone I doubt would enter so readily or so eagerly into the passionate embraces of a man she’d just met. She was the complete opposite of the eponymous Rebecca - but this one is glamorous and fashionable and very much more confident than the original. Additionally, Maxim isn’t nearly mysterious, tetchy and unemotional enough to reflect the character in the book - and the sinister Mrs Danvers is never anything but sinister whereas this character actually smiles and laughs. It reminds me of historical dramas where people acting characters from history are given lines more suited to the 21st century, eg ‘Yeah, right’ or ‘Dream on!’ All out of sync for me but, as I say, I shall wince on with it simply because I like the story.