Donate SIGN UP

Gray & Paul

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 14:34 Thu 20th Sep 2007 | TV
45 Answers
Was it necessary to show that kiss between Gay ( ups missed out the R ) and Paul in Emmerdale at 7-15pm.

Some viewers do not wish to see this, especially when there are very young children present, who cannot understand why two men are kissing each other in such a way.

What homosexuals get up to in private is their own affair, but do we need such scenes thrust into our faces on TV.

Why wasn't a warning given out that this Soap contains scenes likely to offend the viewer?

Gravatar

Answers

41 to 45 of 45rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Oh, AOG !!
I thought you'd put up a better fight than that!
But I accept your complete capitulation, in any case, and we can agree that my last managed to entirely take apart your argument. Perhaps if you had not based it on inaccuracies, prejudices, misinformation, well-known-facts and the workings of your tiny mind it may have proved more of a challenge, but hey ho!

Just because we will never agree, doesn't make you right, you know.

(P.S. I have typed this slowly and with care, without recourse to undue emphasis, etc., as my last posting seemed to cause you some difficulty. I try to do my bit to aid the hard of thinking, AOG.)
Question Author
The usual abuse we have all come to expect from some of the Gay community, when one dares to enter into any form of discussion with them.

Unless one is prepared to wear the pink bow, they will dismiss you as being bigoted, but I much prefer to be called a bigot than the other option.

The usual abuse from the gay community, AOG ? Put your glasses on. There's only me here.
As opposed to the the 'other sort of abuse', eh, AOG ?
The sort meted out by bigots like yourself in the direction of anything the remotest bit challenging; and specifically at gay people.
Please don't delude yourself; you don't enter into discussion; you make sweeping statements and generalisations none of which have basis in the real world and you haven't actually addressed any of the points I raised, AOG; citing an inability to understand them, which is hardly sporting.

You ARE a bigot, AOG. Be proud and stand up a declare yourself, as such. You find people such as me 'unnatural' which is, I must agree, a point of view. It may be a neanderthal and uninformed point of view but it is your right to hold it.
Just don't expect me to remain quiet and afford you an unchallenged platform from which to spout off the usual bilge I associate with you.
definition
bigot: One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.

Please AOG explain how you can claim not to be a bigot. Your postings all stongly suggest you are.

Question Author
definition
bigot: One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is " intolerant of those who differ"?

Surely ruby27 This definition makes most on this news topic section BIGOTS.

When did you last read a post on here, that was tolerant to anyone who dared to differ?

41 to 45 of 45rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Do you know the answer?

Gray & Paul

Answer Question >>