Then the spokesperson goes on to say that 'we will have to rethink our relationship with these people'
Meaning the parts of the media that refuse to accept without question his 'alternative facts'.
So is he going to recruit 'tame media' that do accept with out question anything he says?
It was over the size of the crowd at his inauguration . His spokesman said ''it was the largest crowd for any inauguration in history, Fact ! ''. But aerial photographs clearly showed it was far smaller than the crowd at Obama's inauguration.
What is not in dispute is the 'fact' that there were record numbers of people protesting against his inauguration!
I think the country will not get too het up over a numbers game...
What really matters are the facts that emerge from serious issues such as the relationship with Putin, domestic issues and whether the lives of the ordinary Americans are improved.
'it was the largest crowd for any inauguration in history, Fact !''
he cleverly didn't say it was the largest crowd attending any inauguration in history. Perhaps their alternative facts include the people attending the world wide demonstrations.
Ummmm that was my first thought! That poor woman being forced to stand there and spout tota, Saddam Hussain's spokesman saying on live TV that ''there is no invasion'' when the US tanks could clearly be seen driving up the road just behind him!
Saddam Hussain's spokesman saying on live TV that ''there is no invasion'' when the US tanks could clearly be seen driving up the road just behind him!
On a thread about false information or 'alternative facts EDDIE is the gift that keeps on giving.