Incidently if someone is squatting and a person who normally lives there or has a right to do so asks them to go they have to or they are breaking the law.
I have no doubt about it. If someone comes and occupies my home then I will do whatever to get him/her out and I may not bother calling police or going to court. Call me whatever but if someone comes to my home causing problem then I did not invite him and he should be ready for consequences. Although I am a law abiding person but any law that gives criminal more rights than a victim is simply a wrong law.
Do you think it should be a criminal offence to leave a property unoccupied in London, a city with 150,000 homeless people?
The more unoccupied houses in a City with a housing shortage, drives up rent prices, further hindering peoples' ability to afford a roof over their heads.
Im sorry but if someone moves into a property owned by me without my permission then I think they should be prosecuted, they did not have my permission to be there!
there was an article I read last week about squatters 'being good enough' to move on when they found out the house in which they were squatting belonged to a couple who were about to have a baby, suggesting if they weren't they would have stayed put. This is obviously the circumstance in which the law needs to be clear, and in favour of the home owners.
"Incidently if someone is squatting and a person who normally lives there or has a right to do so asks them to go they have to or they are breaking the law."
You have to get a court order, not just ask. How hard is this? I imagine it to be a very frustrating situation for a landlord.
Victims of squatters must go through the expense and the time involved of obtaining an eviction order through the civil system.
So in addition to having the stress and sense of violation that having squatters must undoubtedly bring (plus being made 'homeless' if you have nowhere else to go), you then have to incur expense to get them out.