ChatterBank0 min ago
is hanging to good for these b******ds
Her 18-year-old friend is seriously ill after being subjected to a violent sexual ordeal by up to six men.
This has left me stunned and Angry and feeling very sad for their poor familys,I dont know if these are the right words to express my feelings.But i just feel hadred for the scum who did this.But right now I would quite happliy pull the lever that would hang those who are guilty.your thoughts please!!
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by VINNY100_2. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.okay, team, here's another story.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/4537001.stm
Guy hasn't got the taxi fare home from a party (�60) so the cabbie dumps him halfway down a dual carriageway. A driver hits him but doesn't bother to stop to see what it was. Minibus drives over him but driver thinks 'it's a bin bag.' Woman runs over him, gets out and finds it's a body, then drives on to a party. Man runs over him, gets out and removes some of his clothing that's got caught on his car, then drives on.
It's three days before anyone reports the accident. Cause of death: multiple injuries.
So what do you think, hanging too good for these animals? Does the fact that they used cars instead of knives make a difference? Does it matter that he was drunk and broke? That he wasn't young, female and pretty? That it happened in Wales so is unlikely to get as much publicity in national newspapers? Just how much do these factors weigh in whether you call for blood?
Whew! including the links. The death penalty was still possible when I was young. When emotion/anger is spent, months after a brutal killing, someone sentenced to hang, there comes the execution morning; grandad's grave face as the minute hand ticked up. I remember two as murder was a rarity then, at least discovered ones. It was a sombre time; might have been mitigating circumstances, perhaps circumstantial evidence. In the last hours a reprieve had been denied by the Home Secretary, despite a petition appealinm for clemency. I was older when Ruth Ellis was hanged and was very upset. Later, when the death penalty was abolished by MPs, I was outraged. Later still, after knowing about the mistakes made, whether it be in hanging, or a long prison sentence, I went against capital punishment. Today murder is commonplace. The tide of violence and murder in our towns and cities, often linked to the drugs trade, makes me re-examine my thoughts. DNA testing CAN make the conviction safe. The case last week re conviction of a man for the killing of Hilda Murrell (?) 20 years ago shows its effectiveness. But what about the times when there's no DNA evidence? It's one thing in the heat of the moment to bay for blood, but what if there are later doubts? Society's decision to kill is then in cold blood. Where there is proper and conclusive evidence I am persuaded that a murderer must be hanged but let's hear all the evidence first. Real killers remain at large in some cases, whilst we are busily 'proving'the guilt of the individual(s) in the dock. I have to accept that such terrible crimes must be deterred somehow; accept that DNA evidence and the scrutiny of the case by a less class-biased (it used to be) media could mean a water-tight case..